Snoobae vs Fub temples

I've built a Fub temple on my first character and was thinking of trying out Snoobae's layout on my second character. The numbers give a slight edge to Snoobae's, but its layout is also slightly more winding, likely making it a bit more tedious to run.

Is anyone with firsthand experience with both of these temples able to offer an anedotal comparison? Any major hangups building Snoobae's temple?

Comments

VeryStruong5 months ago1

So I chose Snoobaes temple because my spy masters are shifted to the corners. My main spymaster chain has been built and I've been working on my corruption chamber and golem works chain for almost a week now (few hours everyday).

TLDR - go with Fubs

The problem with Snoobae layout is if you're just following his video, you create loops at a couple points during the corruption / golem chain that could kill your chain. Either I'm missing something or you really need ungodly luck with sac chambers + rooms you need in a single turn in order to prevent the loop. After bricking my second chain, I know better now and still trying to roll for sac chamber + right rooms to progress. It's painful and I'm not even half way.

I'd rather use roman road russian road or whatever to progress since the rooms are more common. Using paths to progress seems great on paper until you hit the medium loops and then lose days of progress.

RobertoVerge5 months ago1

Im doing the snoo

It takes forever

But what else will I do. About to connect my golem chain after a couple weeks

MucusPanPipe5 months ago1

Snoo's temple takes longer to build and therefore its already better. The game is not about loot, but the journey to get here. I'm almost finished with his temple after 8-10 days, I'm having a lot of fun.

agumon4245 months ago1

Snoobae's temple is harder to complete. You'd need the stars to align at some parts. And even with 11 spymasters you cant even get locks sometimes. At one point you'd have to invest 4/5 lock to guarantee a room to be destabilized.