Getting one girl's number

If you collect one girl's number on your first day at university, people think you're weird. Collect a hundred and suddenly it's networking.

Content works the same way. Copy one person and it's plagiarism. Copy a hundred and it starts to look like art.

Steve Jobs borrowed from Xerox PARC and from Zen Buddhism. Picasso spent years studying African masks and Iberian sculpture before he painted Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. Neither of them came out of nowhere. They just had so many influences that nobody could trace their work back to one source.

This is where most people get it wrong. You see a creator blowing up and assume the move is to replicate what they put out. Same format, same editing style, same offer.

Stealing like an artist was always about borrowing principles instead of outputs. You take the hook from one creator, the business model from a founder, the psychology from a book and the positioning from a luxury brand. Then you run all of it through the advantages only you have.

Call it pattern recognition.

A beginner studies examples. An expert studies patterns.

Thinking outside the box was never the goal. The goal was to collect boxes nobody else thought to combine.

分享X Facebook WhatsApp Reddit

评论

AutoModerator•14 days ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Silly-Penalty7505•14 days ago•1

it's why every decent artist has that phase where they're just a patchwork of their heroes until their own voice seeps through the cracks

相关推荐

Meta and the No Kings backlash

How is there no discussion on this subreddit about this? My Meta feeds are dominated by anti-Meta comments saying everyone needs to abandon Meta. This seems like a good opportunity to start discussing and sharing some alternative social networks. Has anyone taken this as an opportunity to express solidarity against this blatant form of censorship? The problem is that in order to get people to switch from Meta, you kind of have to pay a LOT of money to Meta to advertise. This is also just the latest backlash against Meta after a series of moves by the company that has angered small business owners, page and group owners who now have to pay monthly fees to put links on their content (gimme a break), poor performance on their advertising channels, poor reach from some of their channels based on Meta's algorithm changes. The 1984 style thought control is being thrown in all of our faces and it is unacceptable to me as a citizen to put up with it. So, I know this topic is widely covered, but I was surprised to not see any discussion specifically around this from this past week. So i guess the question is .... what do we do about it?

Would hiring a social media manager help me actually start posting consistently?

I’ve barely posted on social media for years, but I’d like to start building more of a personal/professional presence. My biggest issues are honestly pretty basic: I overthink how I’ll be perceived, get overly focused on likes/views/numbers, and then struggle to post consistently. I can spend way too long thinking about a simple post and then end up posting nothing. I’m wondering if hiring a social media manager or strategist would actually help with this, or if that’s overkill. Ideally I’d want help with content ideas, planning, editing, scheduling, and basically creating enough structure that I stop overthinking every post. I’d still want it to sound like me and not feel overly polished or “influencer-y.” For people who do this professionally: Is this the kind of client/problem a social media manager can actually help with? Would I be better off looking for a social media manager, content strategist, or personal branding person? What would a reasonable monthly budget be? Where would you recommend finding someone good?

about 1 month ago

EVERYTHING ABOUT THE INSTAGRAM ALGORITHM IN 2026

When you post, Instagram doesn't evaluate your content all at once. Distribution is continuous and adaptive. The system is constantly re-ranking your post based on signals it collects over time. Early engagement matters a lot, but posts can pick up hours or even days later, especially Reels. It's not a single batch test. It's an ongoing one. What you need to understand is that the algorithm is always watching the same core signals, and most people are optimizing for the wrong ones. **What actually moves the needle** Instagram's CEO confirmed this year that three signals are driving distribution more than anything else right now. Watch time is number one by a significant margin. Viewers decide within about 1.7 seconds whether to keep watching. If people are dropping off in the first 3 seconds, your post dies. If they make it past 50%, that's a strong signal. If they rewatch, that's explosive. Your retention curve is more important than your like count, full stop. Second is likes per reach, meaning the percentage of people who actually liked your post out of everyone who saw it. This matters more for reaching your existing followers than for growing to new audiences. Third, and this is the one most people are underestimating, is DM shares. When someone sends your post to a friend, Instagram treats it as a stronger endorsement than a like or even a comment. It signals that your content is worth recommending to strangers. Every post should have a built-in "send this to someone who needs it" moment, intentionally. If you're still optimizing primarily for likes in 2026, you're behind. **The format breakdown** Reels are for reaching new people. Carousels and photos are for your existing followers. Stories are for keeping those followers from leaving. They're not interchangeable. They serve completely different purposes in the algorithm. Carousels are underrated right now. Instagram does re-rank posts over time, which means a carousel that didn't land on the first impression can get another shot. The takeaway: make every slide worth stopping on, not just the first. Stories aren't optional if retention matters to you. Accounts that post consistently to Stories see meaningfully fewer unfollows. Stories keep your existing audience warm while your Reels pull new people in. **What you should actually be doing** Forget posting volume targets. Quality is the prerequisite. High frequency with low quality lowers your retention metrics and actively hurts your distribution. Run this instead: Every day: one high-quality Reel with a hook in the first 2 seconds and a clear share trigger built in, plus 3 to 5 Story frames to stay visible and keep your audience connected. Three to four times a week: a carousel optimized for saves and shares, something educational, useful, or worth returning to. Every single post should pass three checks before it goes out. Does the hook land in under 2 seconds? Is there one clear idea? Is there a reason someone would send this to a friend? **On niche consistency** Your last 9 to 12 posts define how Instagram categorizes your account. The algorithm rewards tight topic focus and punishes accounts that drift between unrelated content. Whatever angle you've built your account around, stay in it consistently. It's not about being in a broad niche. It's about having a distinct point of view within one. A hundred fitness creators exist. Only a few have a perspective that's immediately recognizable. That's the real differentiator. **Where I've seen this work** I grew from 100 followers to 360k using these principles. Grew 10+ accounts from 0 to 10k and sold most of them. The process was the same every time: understand what the algorithm is currently rewarding, make content that earns retention and shares, stay consistent for months not weeks, and adjust based on what the data tells you. It's not exciting. It's a system. Systems win. **TLDR** This post blew up last time so I'm bringing it back with answers to the most common questions I got. Before anything else, few things I wish someone told me earlier: 1. **Consistency** is the only thing that actually matters. I know everyone says this and everyone ignores it. That's literally why most people fail. The people winning are not smarter than you, they just didn't quit. 2. Video quality matters more than most people admit. Drop CapCut, get Adobe Premiere or hire an editor. Skip Fiverr, find editors in **Discord communities** instead, way cheaper and actually good. 3. Stop wasting hours on scripts, hooks, and hunting for content ideas manually. I use **SocialHunt** for all of that. You can train it on viral content in your niche and it handles the research and scripting side so you can just focus on filming. 4. Use **Superflow** to handle distribution, workflows, and repetitive ops. If you’re doing things manually, you’re capping growth.

Я нехнаю что делать

Всем привет я хочу у вас спросить я хочу начать снииать видио в тикток я хочу быть блогером но каждый раз меня останавливает то что я боюсь что меня засрут однокласники они и так ко мне относяься не очень им лишбы с меня посмеяться а если я заведу тикток то они его найдут и буду доставать меня и смеяться как думсете может не стоит оно того или на всех и все забить и делать то что я хочу?

about 8 hours ago

How do people add line breaks in TikTok captions

I keep seeing TikTok captions with clean spacing and line breaks, but I can’t figure out how people do it. When I hit the return/enter button, TikTok deletes the line break and smushes everything together. How are creators adding those spaces?

about 8 hours ago

My client was paying for 20 hours and using 9. I almost lost them by saying nothing.

For three months I told myself a quiet client was a happy client. They were on a 20 hour a month retainer. When I finally added up what I had actually done, it came to about 9 hours in September and 8 in August. The posts went out, nothing broke, and I cashed the same check, so I did not look closer. Then their ops person asked on a call, almost as an aside, what the retainer covered again. That question is never really about the list. She could not feel the other 11 hours, so in her head the work had shrunk. I went back through the last quarter and wrote down what was scoped but unused: a monthly report nobody had opened since June, community replies I had quietly stopped doing when approvals slowed down, and a batch of story posts we planned and never shot. Some of that was on me. I had let the slow approval weeks turn into doing less instead of flagging it. So instead of defending the invoice, I brought the list to the next call. I showed the hours they were paying for, the hours they actually got, and three ways to fill the gap with work they had been asking about in passing: reply coverage on weekdays, one short video a week cut from footage they already had, and a simple monthly summary their owner would actually read. They picked two of the three and cut the unused report. Same fee, no discount, and the next month used 18 of the 20 hours. What I took from it: over delivering has a loud problem, you burn out. Under delivering has a quiet one, the client decides you are optional and you only find out at renewal. Now I check the burn rate on every retainer once a month, and if a client is under about two thirds of what they pay for, I raise it myself before they do. How do you catch this on your accounts? Do you track hours against scope, or do you go by deliverables only?

about 9 hours ago