Everygen ai

ok so gng, i saw this instagram short where like u could create viral video stuff. I don't do ts so like thew dude said that u can use claud and everygen to um create a video. Don't hate me on this but i dont want to do it either, i was actuallu curious to whether it would actually work or not. And then when i tried doing it....ding ding. credits. funny right. What im tryna say is, i dont trust putting in personal info in anything that requires to uh buy its plan, straight up scam, or more like untrustworthy..ugh.

分享

评论

AutoModerator•2 days ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

fxfatherman•1 day ago•1

Credits aren’t really a scam sign by themselves. Almost every AI video tool runs that way because each generation costs them real money in compute. What should make you suspicious is the guy in the short. A lot of those “make viral videos in 5 minutes” creators are paid an affiliate cut for every signup, so they leave out the part where you have to pay. If you ever want to test one of these, use a virtual card or a prepaid one with a few bucks on it. That way you see the output before you trust them with anything real.

相关推荐

r/socialmedia

I started requiring a 3 month minimum and the panic clients disappeared

For a long time I let every client start month to month. It felt safer to offer. No commitment, cancel anytime, low pressure. What I actually got was panic. Week two, a client would message asking why sales had not moved yet. Week three, they wanted the whole plan changed. By the end of month one, the ones who were going to leave left anyway, usually right before the content had any chance to build on itself. I was spending the first month of every engagement calming people down instead of doing the work. Earlier this fall I changed one line in how I start. Three month minimum, then month to month after that. I explain it plainly: the first month is setup and testing, the second is where patterns show up, the third is the first month I can honestly judge. Nothing fancy, no lock in speech. One prospect walked away over it and I was braced for more. None of the clients who signed have mentioned it since. Approvals got calmer. I plan a full quarter now instead of hoping each month renews. And the week two panic messages basically stopped, because nobody is deciding whether to quit while the first posts are still going out. What I did not expect is that the minimum did not filter by budget. It filtered by patience. The clients who plan in quarters stay, and they are easier to do good work for. Do you require a minimum term, or do you still start month to month? If you use a minimum, how long is it and how do you explain it?

6 days ago
83· 70%14
r/socialmedia

My client was paying for 20 hours and using 9. I almost lost them by saying nothing.

For three months I told myself a quiet client was a happy client. They were on a 20 hour a month retainer. When I finally added up what I had actually done, it came to about 9 hours in September and 8 in August. The posts went out, nothing broke, and I cashed the same check, so I did not look closer. Then their ops person asked on a call, almost as an aside, what the retainer covered again. That question is never really about the list. She could not feel the other 11 hours, so in her head the work had shrunk. I went back through the last quarter and wrote down what was scoped but unused: a monthly report nobody had opened since June, community replies I had quietly stopped doing when approvals slowed down, and a batch of story posts we planned and never shot. Some of that was on me. I had let the slow approval weeks turn into doing less instead of flagging it. So instead of defending the invoice, I brought the list to the next call. I showed the hours they were paying for, the hours they actually got, and three ways to fill the gap with work they had been asking about in passing: reply coverage on weekdays, one short video a week cut from footage they already had, and a simple monthly summary their owner would actually read. They picked two of the three and cut the unused report. Same fee, no discount, and the next month used 18 of the 20 hours. What I took from it: over delivering has a loud problem, you burn out. Under delivering has a quiet one, the client decides you are optional and you only find out at renewal. Now I check the burn rate on every retainer once a month, and if a client is under about two thirds of what they pay for, I raise it myself before they do. How do you catch this on your accounts? Do you track hours against scope, or do you go by deliverables only?

19 days ago
72· 100%14
r/socialmedia

I sold ad space on my toilet and it went viral (100M views)

This will sound absurd, but it’s completely true. A few months ago, I started selling ad space on my toilet with the goal to make $1,000,000. It started off as a joke and quickly became not a joke, with 25 major companies spending over $125,000 to purchase ad space. The series has gone completely viral and even got me on the news. I think it’s a fun story so I want to break it down here - why it’s working, what it’s like working with these brands, and how you could do something like this yourself. \*\*How it happened\*\* \- I got the idea from the Red Paperclip story: split my toilet into sections, put a price on each one, better spots cost more, and projection map every logo on with its own animation \- I made a fake demo with Microsoft Teams to test it. It blew up and brands flooded the comments, but none of them were serious, they just wanted the impressions \- So I manufactured the first real deal. I showed MoonPay all the other brands commenting, they said yes, and I used that yes as leverage to close everyone else \- I posted once a day for the first two weeks. Every video told viewers to tag companies, and the more companies joined, the more wanted in \- Then I switched to a flat fee that keeps going up, plus a King of The Throne top spot. So far 25 companies have bought in, spots from $1,000 to $17,000, over $125,000 total, and 100M+ views on my projection mapping videos **Why it's working** \- It's a good story. "Unemployed guy tries to make $1,000,000 from his toilet" is a lot catchier than "experienced marketer makes ads," even though both are true \- I'm the underdog, so the audience sees themselves in it and feels like they could do it too \- It's never been done and it can't be copied. People sell ad space on other things now, but there's only one toilet guy \- People actually want to watch these ads and cheer for the next one. That almost never happens \- The Quality Paradox: the video I spend 5 minutes on beats the one I spend 5 months on. People want the guy figuring it out, not the polished final product **What I learned from working with 30 brands** \- Every brand is different. The hands off ones let me do whatever I want, the hands on ones had specific messaging. I had more fun with the hands off ones \- $10,000 sounds insane for one video until you realize I'm the entire studio: idea, script, design, animation, VFX, marketing. A studio charges $100,000 for that, and the brand gets my audience on top of it **How you can do this too** \- Cold outreach doesn't land brand deals. It works for freelance clients, but brands come to you when you prove yourself \- Views aren't proof. Brands need to see the exact concept they're buying \- Make your own series that involves brands: remake logos, design merch, make fake products, whatever fits you. It has to be yours and you have to actually enjoy it \- Be your own agent. Half of me makes the videos, the other half fights to get them seen \- Take the long shots. I sent dozens of DMs and emails to news stations and media, 99% got ignored. Worst case is a minute of embarrassment, the upside is unlimited \- None of it works if it isn't unapologetically you Hope you enjoyed! Lmk if you have any questions

21 days ago
55· 33%15
r/socialmedia

I checked 8 "viral" video formats before starting a new account. None passed the second test

Last month I wanted to start a short video account where every video is rendered from code. No face, no camera. Before making anything I wrote down a pass rule: in the last 90 days, one platform needs 10+ videos over 1M views, from 5+ different accounts, and at least 2 of those accounts under 100k followers. Physics ball simulations passed easily: 88 videos over 1M on TikTok, from 43 accounts. Math animations passed too. Then I added a second test, and it changed everything: what does a random small account in that format get on a normal day? \- Ball sims: a few hundred to about 11k views per video. Followers came out to roughly 640 per million views, so even the hits barely grew the account. \- Data race charts: 34 of the 47 videos over 1M came from reupload or impersonator accounts. \- Turning math curves into sound: 10 small accounts started around the same time, none had a single video reach 10k. I ran the same two tests on 8 formats in total. None of them passed the second one. I still posted a test batch anyway: 7 loop videos, each landed between 320 and 504 views. The one number that tracked views best was how many people were still watching at second 10. What I took from it: counting hit videos measures how much traffic a format has in total. Whether you can get any of it depends on who got in early and who already has distribution. When making the video gets cheaper, more people pile in, and the views go to whoever already has reach. If you've copied a format for your own account, what did you check besides the hit videos?

1 day ago
28
r/socialmedia

how to buy fake insta followers cheap?

Being looking to scale an online business how do I find ig followers cheap on instangram? Havent really tried that in the past looking for help

2 days ago
08
r/socialmedia

Hot take: posting every day on LinkedIn is overrated if you have nothing to say

Tried forcing five posts a week on LI for about two months because everyone kept saying consistency is the whole game, so I just started writing whatever came to mind on a Monday morning and scheduling it out tbh most of them flopped, like the one about my sleep schedule got maybe 11 views and a comment from my aunt, and the post where I rambled about productivity hacks I don't even use got dead silence, probably because it was the same stuff everybody else posts. The ones that actually got real comments were the boring ones where I talked about a client who ghosted me midway through a project and what I'd do differently, people kept replying with their own versions of that story What I cut was basically everything that felt like filler, so I dropped down to two posts a week and only publish when I have an actual specific experience to share, tbh the engagement per post went up even though the total output dropped a lot. Still not sure if I'm just lucky with the comments or if this is the real lesson, the clients angle is definitely working though

2 days ago
49