评论

AutoModerator•2 days ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

相关推荐

r/socialmedia

Why am I using 5 different tools to manage social media?

Maybe this is just me, but my social media workflow currently looks something like: ChatGPT → content ideas Canva → design Scheduler → publishing Analytics tool → reporting Inbox → replies Spreadsheet → planning And then I'm somehow supposed to call this an "efficient workflow"😂 I'm curious if anyone has actually found a social media management tool that brings more of this together. Especially now that Al tools are becoming more capable. Would you rather have one platform that can actually execute tasks, or do you prefer having separate best-in-class tools?

about 1 month ago
17· 100%44
r/socialmedia

Youtube is doubling what it takes to get monetized, and theres a shorts rule in there most people skipped

youtube announced this in august and it kicks in february 1 2027. new channels will need 8,000 watch hours in the last 365 days, up from 4,000, or 20 million shorts views in the last 90 days, up from 10 million. the 1,000 subscriber bar stays. if youre already in the partner program youre grandfathered in, you just have to accept the new terms in studio by january 31 to keep earning on the affected features thats the headline everyone ran. the line i almost missed is on youtubes own help page. to earn from the shorts creator pool each month, creators will need to maintain 10 million qualified shorts views over the last 90 days. the page doesnt spell out whether that part hits people already in the program the same way 10 million every 90 days is a lot for a shorts channel doing fine but not great. you could be monetized on paper and still get nothing from the shorts pool in a slow stretch youtube says the point is to fund new incentive programs for creator growth. my read is the long tail of small shorts channels just got priced out of the pool and whatever was spread across them ends up with the top channels anyone here in ypp mostly on shorts, are you clearing 10 million a quarter right now

about 2 months ago
17· 100%11
r/socialmedia

Kind of funny how "verified human" might end up being the new blue tick

I was thinking about this the other day. We used to treat the blue checkmark on Twitter or Insta as this little status thing, like oh you're somebody. LinkedIn's got its own verified badge now too. And the whole point of those was basically "this account is legit." But with how much AI and bot stuff is everywhere now, I feel like the flex is quietly shifting. It's not "I'm verified as important" anymore, it's becoming "I'm verified as an actual human being." Which is a hilarious bar to have to clear honestly. Congrats, you're a person, here's your badge. And the way you'd earn that badge is kind of low effort compared to the old verification circus, from what I've seen it's usually just a quick selfie, you show your face for a second and it confirms a real person's there. A few tools already do versions of this (Selfie Check, iProov, Incode, I think). I don't remember the exact details of each, something about proving you're a real unique human without your actual name or ID attached to it. So you could imagine a near future where that little "real human" tick is worth more than the old blue one ever was. Kind of a funny and weird timeline where proving you're not a robot is the new clout.

about 2 months ago
17· 100%12
r/socialmedia

My 26-word intro post on X got 54,979 views. My posts about other companies' AI launches got about 600.

54,979 views on a 26-word post. It said roughly this: 26, from Denmark. Left a CTO role, building solo now. If you're in AI, let's connect. That's it. 434 replies. 1,044 likes. I posted a second intro on Nov 4. 12,820 views. 222 replies. Same account, same weeks: six posts breaking down other companies' AI launches. Each one ended with a broad question. 594 to 899 views each. My median over the last 14 days is 1,859 views across 133 posts. So the intro did about 30x my normal. The launch breakdowns did about half. What I take from it: People follow a person, not a news feed. "Who I am" got about 90x more views than "what someone else launched." News accounts already cover the news, and faster. Nobody else can post your intro. What I changed: Less summarizing other people's launches. More of my own numbers, my own story, my own opinions. Curious how this looks from your side. Do intro or "let's connect" posts still work for you, or is that only on X?

2 days ago
25
r/socialmedia

YouTube managing comments?

Is there app to control comments from multiple Social platforms, Like IG, FB, YT, Tiktok. I need to manage comments from one site, Because i have rlly lot of comments, and Many of them are bad.

2 days ago
311
r/socialmedia

Does anyone else get better social media engagement during working hours?

I’ve noticed something interesting lately. Most social media advice and platform analytics suggest that the best times to post are early in the morning, during lunch breaks, or in the evening, when people are generally more active. However, my experience seems to contradict that. When I post during regular working hours, my posts tend to perform better and receive more engagement. I’m curious why this happens. Are people just bored at work? Are they taking more breaks to scroll through social media? Or has the way we use our phones changed so much that working hours are actually a great time to post? Maybe the traditional advice about the best times to post isn’t as accurate as it used to be. Has anyone else experienced this? What times have you found work best for your posts?

2 days ago
810