What is engagement on LinkedIn?

Everyone talks about "boosting engagement" but nobody actually breaks down what that means practically. Likes, comments, shares, clicks they all count differently and yet most people treat them the same.

From what I have seen comments carry the most weight both for the algorithm and for actual human memory. When someone leaves a genuinely thoughtful comment I remember their name way longer than whoever wrote the original post. Is that just me or does anyone else experience linkedIn that way?

Share

Comments

Ok-Cost4302•7 months ago•2

Comments are just free networking that most people ignore.

Glittering-Pen-4071•7 months ago•1

I never thought about it this way until I noticed my own behavior. I'll forget a post in an hour but remember a commenter for weeks. Says everything really.

Unfair-Comment4449•7 months ago•1

The way I see it  a like is a nod, a share is a handshake, but a comment is an actual conversation. LinkedIn's algorithm rewards dwell time and replies, and nothing creates that chain like a good comment thread. Most people optimizing for "engagement" are just chasing likes which is honestly the weakest signal of the three.

No_Procedure8667•7 months ago•1

i think comments get all the credit but saves are the real sleeper. linkedin doesn't show them publicly so nobody talks about them, but i've had posts with barely any likes get pushed way harder than ones with tons of reactions, and the only difference i could see was saves.

the commenter thing you mentioned is real though. i'll forget who posted something but remember who left a good comment on it for weeks. some people figured this out and their whole strategy is just commenting on other people's stuff. never posting themselves. arguably better ROI tbh.

the other thing nobody talks about is that linkedin clearly treats long comments differently than "great post!" replies. like it's not even close. one thoughtful comment from someone with a decent network can do moren for a post's reach than 30 fire emojis

Independent_Use_3676•7 months ago•1

I've noticed the same. Like are easy and happen almost automatically, but comments usually mean someone actually read and thought about the post.

From an algorithm perspective, comments and meaningful discussion tend to push post further because they signal real interaction.

Share are probably the strongest signal though, since someone is putting your content in front of their own network.

So practically it's something like: Likes = light interest, comments = real engagement, shares = strongest signal.

bengunners•7 months ago•1

One thing missing from most engagement discussions is timing. The first 60-90 minutes after posting is when LinkedIn decides if your content gets pushed wider or dies. Early comments (especially ones that generate replies) signal to the algorithm that there's a real conversation happening.

The reply chain effect is huge too. A single comment that sparks 4-5 back and forth replies can do more for your reach than 20 standalone comments. That's why the best commenters don't just drop a take and leave - they stick around and actually engage with responses.

I'd also add that the type of reaction matters more than people think. "Insightful" and "Love" reactions seem to carry slightly more weight than a basic like, probably because they require one extra click which signals more intent. Not a huge difference but noticeable over time.

The commenter memory thing you mentioned is 100% real. I've gotten more DMs and connection requests from strategic commenting than from posting. Some people have built entire personal brands just from being "that person" who always has something useful to add.

Various-Tailor-6209•7 months ago•1

honestly you're 100% right about the memory thing. I've noticed the same, i can tell you exactly who wrote a thoughtful comment on my recent post but i couldn't tell you who just reacted to my them.

as far as the weighting goes, the LI algorithm is basically designed to back up exactly what you're seeing. It’s obsessed with dwell time and meaningful engagement rn. if someone stops to actually type a reply, it tells the algo the post is high quality, so it pushes it to a wider slice of your network.

a few things people usually miss when they talk about this:

  1. that first hour is everything. if you don't get a few comments in the first 60-90 min the algo will most likely bury it as it thinks its low quality.

  2. external links are reach killers (honestly the algo is so petty and jealous of you even suggesting someone to leave the platform) so its preferred to put your link in the comments, unless the post is all about the click, then I would still just put it in the post thb.

  3. posting and ghosting is a big no-no. make sure to be engaging on the platform before and after you post and def reply and react to any comments you get on your own post.

in short, if it feels like a real conversation, the algo loves it. if it feels like noise in a void, it dies.

AutoModerator•7 months ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

justdivya•7 months ago•1

Understanding LinkedIn engagement is very tough tbh. I've started posting on LinkedIn for the past 2 months and it's been a very roller-coaster type of experience there. Sometimes some posts get thousands of views but barely 15–20 reactions, but on the other hand some posts get like 400–500 views and more reactions and comments than the posts with high views.

Usually, I pay more attention to comments and meaningful discussions. Because for me, if a post is getting fewer views but many people are commenting and starting conversations on it, that's stronger engagement than a post with high views but no interaction.

More like this

r/socialmedia

Social media is definitely over glamorized… As someone who quit there 9-5 & started working full time as a content creator who makes roughly 4-6k a month

Definitely changed my life & gives me so much more free time but also ruined my life. Its been 2 years & im slowly starting to hate it , especially as somebody who runs everything by themselves with no help. It’s a lot more than people think and actually having control over everything and choosing your own schedule is much harder than some people think you have to push yourself more to make the content to engage to produce to push yourself to a new extreme and much more, I will say I’ve learned a lot, but I’ve also lost a lot , my brain chemistry will never be the same again after this job, which I’m OK with that, but there’s a lot more to it than what people say, especially in the industry that I work in

17 days ago
120· 71%43
r/socialmedia

What social media trend are you noticing right now?

Social media feels very different in 2026. A few things I’ve noticed: \* AI content is everywhere, so real human content stands out more. \* Small niche creators often have stronger communities than huge pages. \* People now use Instagram, TikTok, Reddit and YouTube like search engines. \* Short-form video is still huge, but useful content performs better than random clips. \* Building a community is becoming more valuable than just gaining followers. I think the biggest trend is simple: \*\*Content is getting easier to create, but trust is getting harder to earn.\*\*

7 days ago
99· 100%32
r/socialmedia

Hot take: going viral once is one of the worst things that can happen to a small account

Hear me out. One post hits 500K views, you pick up a couple thousand followers who came for that one random thing, and then your next 10 posts do worse than before the viral one. Those new people followed a moment, not you. They don't watch your normal stuff, so the platform sees lower watch time and engagement on everything after and quietly pulls back reach. From what I've seen, more small accounts stall after a viral hit than grow from it. The ones that actually benefit already had a clear thing they post about, so the viral post was just a louder version of their normal content. So instead of chasing one big hit, maybe chase being the account people come back to. Disagree? Has a viral post actually helped your account long term, or did it mess up your reach after?

8 days ago
51· 100%62
r/socialmedia

How to Approve Social Posts before Publishing - TikTok, etc.

Hello community members. I have a question I'm looking for guidance with, and I'm hoping someone here has the answer. I work at a school and am interested in setting up a school TikTok account for the first time; however, I want 99% of the content to be created by our students. I want to give students direct access to the TikTok account and approve their posts before they are published. I understand that with programs like Buffer, I can do this if students submit the post through Buffer itself. However, this is not ideal, as I want to create a workflow that is as simple as possible for students. If I ask them to create something on TikTok and then upload it to Buffer, it may be too many steps and could discourage participation. Is there an easy way, without spending thousands of dollars, to accomplish this wish? I want students to be able to compose posts naturally on TikTok, and for administrators like me to review the content and hit publish ourselves. Thanks so much!

3 days ago
511
r/socialmedia

How do you handle music for brand Reels/TikToks?

Genuine question for people managing brand accounts. Where does your music come from: trending sounds, a library like Epidemic, something custom? Have you ever had a video muted or taken down over music? And what’s the most annoying part of the whole thing?

3 days ago
412
r/socialmedia

Will the social media influencer era will be dead after the new ai influencers wave?

I’ve been thinking that many people aspire to become influencers and gain recognition on social media platforms by creating content. However, with the rise of AI influencers, it will become increasingly challenging to compete with them across various domains, including travel, fashion, and information dissemination. Do you see this too?

3 days ago
223