What if a science channel didn't care about subject boundaries?

I've been working on a YouTube channel, and I'd love some genuine feedback from people who actually consume science/educational content online.

As most science explainer channels pick a lane — they'll explain why the sky is blue from a physics perspective, or maybe touch on atmospheric chemistry, and call it a day. My channel's whole premise is to go further and break down phenomena using all the relevant disciplines together — physics, chemistry, biology, and mathematics — because that's how reality actually works. No artificial subject boundaries.

For example, instead of just explaining "why do we feel cold when we sweat" as a simple evaporation story, I want to trace it from the thermodynamics of phase transitions → to the biochemistry of sweat glands → to the neurological signalling that makes you feel temperature → to the mathematical models behind heat dissipation from the body.

Here's my concern — this kind of depth is genuinely hard to present in an engaging way, especially without losing people halfway through. I don't want to dumb it down, but I also don't want viewers to feel like they're reading a textbook.

Some things I'm already thinking about:

Strong visual storytelling / animations

Hooking with a relatable everyday phenomenon before going deep

Keeping a conversational tone

But I'd love to know:

What do channels that cover complex science do that actually keeps you watching?

What kills your interest mid-video, even when the topic is interesting?

How do you balance depth with accessibility without being patronising?

Is there a format (long-form deep dives, Shorts, series structure) that works best for this kind of multi-disciplinary content?

And also the most important question (honest opinions please):

I'm Indian. I want to grow this channel to reach people across India, but also globally if possible.

Now here's the thing — I've seen a lot of discussion online (and frankly, experienced it myself) about how Indian creators making English content sometimes face an uphill battle internationally, whether because of accent bias, assumptions about quality, or just algorithmic disadvantages. I'm not going to pretend that bias doesn't exist.

So I genuinely don't know what the smarter move is.

I genuinely want the hard, honest feedback. If you think this concept is flawed or won't work, tell me that too.

Thanks in advance 🙏

Comments

AutoModerator•3 months ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

ishamalhotra09•3 months ago•1

Strong idea Hook fast, simplify with visuals, use series format.
Clarity > accent

dfuzr_agent05•3 months ago•1

I actually think the concept is strong, the interdisciplinary angle is something a lot of science channels claim but few really commit to. The key is structuring it so viewers don’t feel lost when you jump between physics, biology, and math. A clear roadmap at the start like “we’ll go from sweat to molecules to neurons to math” helps people stay oriented.

What usually keeps me watching complex science videos is progressive layering. Start with intuition, then zoom into mechanisms, then show the deeper model. If it goes straight into heavy detail without building context, that’s when I drop off. Visual transitions between disciplines also matter so it feels like one story, not separate mini lectures.

What kills interest is cognitive overload. Too many new terms back to back, or long explanations without visual change. Even deep channels keep momentum by switching visuals every few seconds and revisiting the main question often.

A series format might work best. One core phenomenon, broken into chapters that connect smoothly. That way you keep depth but viewers don’t feel trapped in a 20 minute wall of information. Shorts could also act as entry points that funnel into the full deep dive.

The accent concern is real but usually overestimated. Clarity, pacing, and audio quality matter more than accent. Plenty of global audiences watch creators from everywhere. A neutral pace and clean audio can remove most friction.

You could even prototype the structure quickly using Runable to map visuals, script flow, and chapter transitions before fully producing. That makes it easier to test whether the multi discipline narrative actually feels smooth.

Overall, the idea isn’t flawed. It just lives or dies on structure. If each discipline feels like a step in one story rather than a detour, it could actually stand out a lot.

More like this

EVERYTHING ABOUT THE INSTAGRAM ALGORITHM IN 2026

When you post, Instagram doesn't evaluate your content all at once. Distribution is continuous and adaptive. The system is constantly re-ranking your post based on signals it collects over time. Early engagement matters a lot, but posts can pick up hours or even days later, especially Reels. It's not a single batch test. It's an ongoing one. What you need to understand is that the algorithm is always watching the same core signals, and most people are optimizing for the wrong ones. **What actually moves the needle** Instagram's CEO confirmed this year that three signals are driving distribution more than anything else right now. Watch time is number one by a significant margin. Viewers decide within about 1.7 seconds whether to keep watching. If people are dropping off in the first 3 seconds, your post dies. If they make it past 50%, that's a strong signal. If they rewatch, that's explosive. Your retention curve is more important than your like count, full stop. Second is likes per reach, meaning the percentage of people who actually liked your post out of everyone who saw it. This matters more for reaching your existing followers than for growing to new audiences. Third, and this is the one most people are underestimating, is DM shares. When someone sends your post to a friend, Instagram treats it as a stronger endorsement than a like or even a comment. It signals that your content is worth recommending to strangers. Every post should have a built-in "send this to someone who needs it" moment, intentionally. If you're still optimizing primarily for likes in 2026, you're behind. **The format breakdown** Reels are for reaching new people. Carousels and photos are for your existing followers. Stories are for keeping those followers from leaving. They're not interchangeable. They serve completely different purposes in the algorithm. Carousels are underrated right now. Instagram does re-rank posts over time, which means a carousel that didn't land on the first impression can get another shot. The takeaway: make every slide worth stopping on, not just the first. Stories aren't optional if retention matters to you. Accounts that post consistently to Stories see meaningfully fewer unfollows. Stories keep your existing audience warm while your Reels pull new people in. **What you should actually be doing** Forget posting volume targets. Quality is the prerequisite. High frequency with low quality lowers your retention metrics and actively hurts your distribution. Run this instead: Every day: one high-quality Reel with a hook in the first 2 seconds and a clear share trigger built in, plus 3 to 5 Story frames to stay visible and keep your audience connected. Three to four times a week: a carousel optimized for saves and shares, something educational, useful, or worth returning to. Every single post should pass three checks before it goes out. Does the hook land in under 2 seconds? Is there one clear idea? Is there a reason someone would send this to a friend? **On niche consistency** Your last 9 to 12 posts define how Instagram categorizes your account. The algorithm rewards tight topic focus and punishes accounts that drift between unrelated content. Whatever angle you've built your account around, stay in it consistently. It's not about being in a broad niche. It's about having a distinct point of view within one. A hundred fitness creators exist. Only a few have a perspective that's immediately recognizable. That's the real differentiator. **Where I've seen this work** I grew from 100 followers to 360k using these principles. Grew 10+ accounts from 0 to 10k and sold most of them. The process was the same every time: understand what the algorithm is currently rewarding, make content that earns retention and shares, stay consistent for months not weeks, and adjust based on what the data tells you. It's not exciting. It's a system. Systems win. **TLDR** This post blew up last time so I'm bringing it back with answers to the most common questions I got. Before anything else, few things I wish someone told me earlier: 1. **Consistency** is the only thing that actually matters. I know everyone says this and everyone ignores it. That's literally why most people fail. The people winning are not smarter than you, they just didn't quit. 2. Video quality matters more than most people admit. Drop CapCut, get Adobe Premiere or hire an editor. Skip Fiverr, find editors in **Discord communities** instead, way cheaper and actually good. 3. Stop wasting hours on scripts, hooks, and hunting for content ideas manually. I use **SocialHunt** for all of that. You can train it on viral content in your niche and it handles the research and scripting side so you can just focus on filming. 4. Use **Superflow** to handle distribution, workflows, and repetitive ops. If you’re doing things manually, you’re capping growth.

3 months ago

255

Any people that runs 100 to 10k followers pages (any social media)?

Hey all, I own a business that involves many clients that promote their product, art or website with TikTok (also Instagram, Youtube and Facebook). I want to offer them a way to post their content, or to get content created and posted for them on existing TikTok pages. Basically you got pages in a specific theme (sport, anime, cinema, culture, memes...) and you rent it for a specific period of time. You get paid every month, and all you have to do is basically connecting the account once to our system. You can opt-out anytime you want, you keep the full ownership of the account. That's basically a way to monetize your pages passively. For now I'm doing it myself with my own pages (3 tiktok pages with 500 to 3k followers, and 1 6k subscribers Youtube channel), I made around $800 renting these for less than a month. If someone is interested, please comment or DM!

3 months ago

222

Everything dying at 300 views for so long before I finally caught the problem

I've been absolutely obsessed with short form content for the last two years. Like people have staged actual interventions about my health level of obsessed. I'm talking 11-14 hour days breaking down what separates successful videos from failures, experimenting with different hook variations, rewriting scripts until my brain hurts, testing every editing approach I could possibly get my hands on. Why this level of obsession? Because I'm absolutely certain short form video is the backbone of everything right now. Growing followers, selling anything, generating opportunities, creating brands from nothing. Every part of it depends on whether you can hold someone's attention for 30 seconds. But here's what nearly made me quit entirely: despite the constant daily grind, nothing was hitting. I'd pour 7-8 hours into crafting one video only to watch it crash at 300 views. Tried every tactic from every person claiming to have figured it out. Bought their courses. Applied their "proven" methods. Still going nowhere. I seriously started thinking maybe I'm just not the type of person who can make this work. Like maybe there's some fundamental ability I'm completely lacking. Then something clicked. I'm grinding constantly, but I'm operating completely blind. I don't actually know what's broken. I'm essentially just trying random things hoping something eventually works. So I stopped hunting for some mythical viral code and started analyzing actual data. Analyzed my last 50 videos second by second, documented every retention drop, and discovered 5 consistent patterns that were systematically killing my performance: 1. **Vague mysterious hooks are totally invisible** "This will transform you..." gets scrolled past every time. But "I used resistance bands for 55 days and my shoulder mobility actually decreased" stops people mid scroll. Specific concrete details destroy vague teasing without exception. 2. **Seconds 5-7 are where everything gets decided** Most viewers leave between 4-7 seconds if you haven't proven it's worth watching. I was creating slow buildups like a complete amateur. Now my strongest visual or most compelling number arrives exactly at second 5. That's where the hook that genuinely holds people. 3. **Any gap beyond 1 second absolutely kills your retention** Tracked this obsessively, anything past 1.2 seconds makes people think the video stopped. What feels like natural comfortable pacing to you reads as complete dead time to someone scrolling. Cut significantly tighter than feels normal. 4. **Visual variety is absolutely critical** If nothing changes on screen for more than 3 seconds, attention vanishes without warning. I started constantly rotating camera angles, cutting to b-roll, moving text placement, literally anything to maintain constant visual movement. Went from losing 50% at the halfway mark to keeping 70%. 5. **Rewatch rate is dramatically more important than most people realize** Videos people watch more than once get pushed exponentially harder by the algorithm. Started planting subtle details that aren't obvious first viewing, editing faster, adding elements worth discovering on rewatch. Rewatch percentage jumped from 8% to 31% and reach went completely through the roof. Honestly the biggest shift was abandoning all guesswork and actually measuring what was happening at every second. Came across this one app that goes way beyond showing where people drop off, it literally tells you why and exactly how to correct it. That's when everything transformed. Went from averaging 300 views to hitting 18k in about 4 weeks. Regular analytics show you people are leaving. This one shows the exact second, the actual reason, and what to adjust before your next post. If you're uploading consistently but stuck below 1k views, your content isn't the problem. You just don't know what's genuinely working versus what you assume is working. Listen, I'm sharing this because breaking through was honestly one of the hardest things I've tackled. I really wish someone had just explained exactly what needed fixing when I was stuck there. Would have saved months of confusion and doubt. So that's what I'm doing now for anyone who needs it.

4 months ago

221