X’s “Kill Switch” vs. Crypto: If the platform hates Crypto, why are projects still paying for the privilege?
It’s a bizarre paradox, isn't it? You’ve got the Head of Product essentially calling the "Crypto Twitter" (CT) culture a cesspool of bots and engagement farming, yet every new project still treats X like the Holy Grail of marketing.
In the last few weeks, he’s basically declared war on Crypto:
· The "Kill Switch": New accounts that mention crypto for the first time are now "auto-locked" for identity verification.
· The "80% Bot" Claim: Bier claims 80% of interactions on crypto accounts are fake.
· The Anti-Hype Policy: Revoking API access for "InfoFi" apps and tightening the screws on prediction markets like Polymarket.
Bier says he’s "sanitizing" the platform, but from where I’m standing, it feels like they’re just locking out authentic voices while the sophisticated bot farms—the ones he claims to hate—are the only ones with the resources to bypass his new hurdles.
My question for the sub: If this is X's official stance—that our community is fundamentally "spammy" and "inauthentic"—why are crypto projects still pouring millions into X ads and making it their primary home?
Are we just stuck in a toxic relationship because of the "network effect," or is there a better trail we should be riding? I’m currently building on BlueSky, but the silence there is deafening compared to the chaos of X.