Don’t look up

Can’t deny, it’s inaccurate

Because people wouldn’t keep asking questions, they’d just get mad at Ali

Ali in the UK. Jose in the US

Even thinking from a UK perspective, 0.3% of our budget goes towards asylum seekers, and we use our foreign aid budget for it

70% of non-pension welfare that goes to foreign nationals goes to EU immigrants with EUSS (protected by the Withdrawal Agreement), and considering half of total welfare is pensions, that means we spend 1% of our budget on welfare to foreign nationals

We spend 15% of our budget on pensions and 20% on healthcare (half of hospital admissions are OAPs and 35% of doctors in 2019 were foreign)

Immigrants are not the reason for our budget woes

According to HMRC, our “tax gap” is £46 billion, which is far, far more than the amount we spend on immigrants 

Ngl I get a little more radical ever day now.. like ive never liked the government but... anymore I almost wish I had the charisma to lead the charge.

https://preview.redd.it/i7aa21sf458h1.jpeg?width=450&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1f36feb28ef7c90b06b91056d6f64db25cc0de92

In the US they’d claim he was a DEI doctor. Gotta keep up the self-esteem of the red blooded Americans that applied to med school with a 2.0.

Please tag your video appropriately I was not prepared for a Margaret Thatcher Jumpscare today.

I'd like to talk a little bit about how statistics often get distorted to make it appear that foreign-born people are on the dole more than they actually are.

In the United states, we sometimes see statistics that show that Mexican-American households, that is households that are headed by someone who was born in mexico, are on welfare at higher rates, or using government services at higher rates than houses headed by native born americans. However, these statistics are a little bit deceptive because they don't factor in household size. Native born Americans are more likely to have balkanized families: a single mom living with her child, the child's father living alone with a new girlfriend, and the single mom's parents living independently in their own home. In the eyes of the census takers that's three separate households. Now imagine a Mexican American family where the mom and daughter married, they live together with their child in the same house with the grandparents. That's one household in the eyes of the census takers. If the child is receiving some kind of government benefit, such as a reduced School lunch, for the native-born family that's one out of three households on welfare. But for the Mexican-American family, the whole household is considered to be on welfare even though it's only one member of the household that's availing themselves of that benefit, the free school lunch.

Another way in which the statistics are sometimes a bit deceptive is that Mexican-American immigrants are heavily concentrated in the southern states, and Americans of Mexican heritage are as well. In the economically marginal Southern states (such as New Mexico), higher percentages of people, both of Mexican descent and not, are on government services. New Mexico is economically marginal compared with most U.S. states because it has long had lower incomes, higher poverty rates, and less economic diversification, with many areas depending on government, energy, and resource-based industries. Its rural geography, limited major private-sector employers, and infrastructure challenges have made it harder to attract investment and create broad-based economic growth. So anyone living in New mexico, regardless of their heritage or nationality of birth, is just more likely to be on government services.

Propaganda is a helluva drug and Oligarchs need to use some of the best to keep the 99% distracted from the real issue: Them.

Fuck Ali i guess