Look for advice about monetization

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

The problem isn't audience size — it's a format mismatch with how most brand deals are structured. Standard sponsorships expect creators who can integrate products into their content. Your iconification process doesn't bend around a product placement, so you keep getting offers that don't fit.

Two paths that match what you're actually building:

Sell the skill, not the audience. The iconification style is a productizable creative service. Entertainment brands, sports accounts, streaming platforms — they want illustrated moments for their own social presence. You're already doing it for free with viral clips. Custom versions for brands at $200-400 per piece is realistic, and your portfolio is already public.

Digital products over sponsorships. Your followers are there because they love the aesthetic. They're a strong signal that people want to learn the technique. A style tutorial, brush pack, or process breakdown sells to that exact audience without needing a brand intermediary.

The "brands reach out but nothing fits" thing is a positioning gap, not an audience gap. Right now you're letting the brand define the deal (their game, their format) instead of selling the thing you actually do. Your product isn't sponsored posts, it's the iconified transformation. Once you frame it that way, the buyers change.

Who actually fits your format:

• Entertainment, streaming, sports, and music accounts that need art for their own feeds. They already post viral moments. You turn one into a signature illustrated frame. That's a commission, not a sponsorship.
• The original creators and pages whose clips went viral. A lot of them will pay for the iconified version to repost.
• Anyone running a launch who wants a "moment" illustrated instead of another stock graphic.

On commissions not taking off: that's almost never a demand problem, it's a funnel and pricing problem. If the offer lives in a highlight nobody taps, or the price isn't visible, people scroll past even when they want it. Pin one post: here's what I make, here's the price, here's how to book. Make it one tap.

On pricing, separate two things so you don't undercharge: the work itself (making the piece) and usage (if they run it as an ad or license it, that's a separate line, not a tip). I undercharged for years by bundling those together. Don't.

And stop waiting on the inbound. DM 5 accounts that fit this week with one line: "I turn viral moments into iconified art for your feed, want one of yours?" and attach your best piece. Your portfolio is already public, so it's the whole pitch.

The digital product angle someone else mentioned is right too. A preset pack or a short "how I iconify" tutorial sells to the exact people already following you for the look.

First of all, wtf is your IG page? Over 50k followers, I’ll pay you to drop a promo what on earth.

you could post dedicated stories without alienating your audience. You need to reach out, they won't come to you. if you search for influencer agencies and use your page as a door opener, brands will reach out for you to make content for their pages. you won't even have to post it. It's call UGC.

I would stop thinking of it only as a page that needs sponsors and start packaging the thing people already value: the transformation style.

A simple offer ladder could be:

1. Paid custom transformations or commissions.
2. Licensing the style for brands or creators.
3. A recurring series sponsored by a brand only if the format stays intact.
4. A small digital product or template pack if the audience keeps asking how you do it.

The key is not taking the first random sponsor. Protect the reason people follow the page, then build offers around that.