I think there would be interest, but the hard part is deciding what replaces the feedback loop. Public likes and follower counts can make a space noisy and performative, yet completely removing signals can make it difficult for people to know whether a post was seen or useful.
A middle ground could be no public counts, with private feedback for the person posting. For example, a creator might see meaningful replies, saves, or a simple weekly summary, while everyone else just sees the conversation. That preserves useful learning without turning every post into a scoreboard.
The other big question is discovery. Without some ranking or recommendation signals, a quieter network can still become dominated by whoever posts most often. I would make the first version intentionally small and chronological, then test whether people return because the conversations feel better, not because the numbers are higher.