What do you include in your client intakes/workshops to inform a social playbook?

I mostly work with startups, and their scrappy budgets mean limited time and materials, so our intake has been pretty informal and less than ideal. Up to now we’ve usually drafted a version of the playbook based on the materials and conversations we've had and had the client react to it. I want to formalize that process more and do more formal albeit still quick intake session before I draft the playbook.

What types of questions/discussion topics do you typically include in your intakes/workshops? What do you bring for them to react to (sample posts, charcteristics to define voice/tone) vs what do you leave completely open for discussion, with limited time?

Share

Comments

AutoModerator•1 day ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Beneficial-Serve-513•1 day ago•1

I'd bring things to react to, because startup founders answer a draft faster than an open question. Three sample posts in different tones ("which one sounds like you?") and two or three accounts they like or hate cover voice in ten minutes. I'd leave open who the customer is, what they can't say publicly, and who approves posts.

Ask about approvals early. A founder who needs a week to sign off can't support a daily plan.

Geraldwelly•1 day ago•1

What saved us the most time was bringing things to react to instead of questions. We put 6 to 8 real posts from competitors and adjacent brands on screen and have them call each one "us" or "not us" and say why. That surfaces voice faster than any adjective exercise. The only open questions we keep are who actually approves posts, what they'd hate to see go out, and what one result would make the next 90 days a win. Everything else we draft and let them mark up.

PeepSoWP•about 23 hours ago•1

I'd add one short comment-response scenario alongside the sample posts: a customer complains publicly, or asks a question the social person can't answer. Who acknowledges it, who owns the answer, and when does it move to a private support channel?

You can settle that with one example in a few minutes, then put the response owner and escalation path in the playbook. Posting approvals are only half the workflow if nobody is responsible for the conversation after publication. Ask which recurring questions they want the community to be able to answer for each other too.

pagematter•1 day ago•1

One thing worth adding when you formalize this: separate collecting materials from the conversation. Send a short async form a few days before the session that asks for the raw stuff - brand docs, past posts that performed, product photos, and real customer language from reviews or support chats. Then the session gets spent on judgment calls instead of hunting for files.

With limited time, the questions that do the most work:

  • Who actually approves posts, and what turnaround you both agree to. Get that stated explicitly, otherwise slow approvals quietly stall the whole calendar.
  • What can we never say: competitors, pricing, legal, topics the founder hates.
  • Who the real customer is and what they complain about.

React-to material beats open questions for voice: two or three sample tones or competitor posts and have them pick which sounds like them. Keep the customer definition and the approval chain as open discussion, since those need talking through, not selecting.

On access: use the intake to map which accounts and permissions you will need, then have the client grant them through role-based invites or a password manager. Passwords, 2FA codes and recovery codes should never go into an intake form, email or notes.

More like this

r/socialmedia

I started requiring a 3 month minimum and the panic clients disappeared

For a long time I let every client start month to month. It felt safer to offer. No commitment, cancel anytime, low pressure. What I actually got was panic. Week two, a client would message asking why sales had not moved yet. Week three, they wanted the whole plan changed. By the end of month one, the ones who were going to leave left anyway, usually right before the content had any chance to build on itself. I was spending the first month of every engagement calming people down instead of doing the work. Earlier this fall I changed one line in how I start. Three month minimum, then month to month after that. I explain it plainly: the first month is setup and testing, the second is where patterns show up, the third is the first month I can honestly judge. Nothing fancy, no lock in speech. One prospect walked away over it and I was braced for more. None of the clients who signed have mentioned it since. Approvals got calmer. I plan a full quarter now instead of hoping each month renews. And the week two panic messages basically stopped, because nobody is deciding whether to quit while the first posts are still going out. What I did not expect is that the minimum did not filter by budget. It filtered by patience. The clients who plan in quarters stay, and they are easier to do good work for. Do you require a minimum term, or do you still start month to month? If you use a minimum, how long is it and how do you explain it?

11 days ago
83· 70%14
r/socialmedia

My client was paying for 20 hours and using 9. I almost lost them by saying nothing.

For three months I told myself a quiet client was a happy client. They were on a 20 hour a month retainer. When I finally added up what I had actually done, it came to about 9 hours in September and 8 in August. The posts went out, nothing broke, and I cashed the same check, so I did not look closer. Then their ops person asked on a call, almost as an aside, what the retainer covered again. That question is never really about the list. She could not feel the other 11 hours, so in her head the work had shrunk. I went back through the last quarter and wrote down what was scoped but unused: a monthly report nobody had opened since June, community replies I had quietly stopped doing when approvals slowed down, and a batch of story posts we planned and never shot. Some of that was on me. I had let the slow approval weeks turn into doing less instead of flagging it. So instead of defending the invoice, I brought the list to the next call. I showed the hours they were paying for, the hours they actually got, and three ways to fill the gap with work they had been asking about in passing: reply coverage on weekdays, one short video a week cut from footage they already had, and a simple monthly summary their owner would actually read. They picked two of the three and cut the unused report. Same fee, no discount, and the next month used 18 of the 20 hours. What I took from it: over delivering has a loud problem, you burn out. Under delivering has a quiet one, the client decides you are optional and you only find out at renewal. Now I check the burn rate on every retainer once a month, and if a client is under about two thirds of what they pay for, I raise it myself before they do. How do you catch this on your accounts? Do you track hours against scope, or do you go by deliverables only?

24 days ago
72· 100%14
r/socialmedia

I sold ad space on my toilet and it went viral (100M views)

This will sound absurd, but it’s completely true. A few months ago, I started selling ad space on my toilet with the goal to make $1,000,000. It started off as a joke and quickly became not a joke, with 25 major companies spending over $125,000 to purchase ad space. The series has gone completely viral and even got me on the news. I think it’s a fun story so I want to break it down here - why it’s working, what it’s like working with these brands, and how you could do something like this yourself. \*\*How it happened\*\* \- I got the idea from the Red Paperclip story: split my toilet into sections, put a price on each one, better spots cost more, and projection map every logo on with its own animation \- I made a fake demo with Microsoft Teams to test it. It blew up and brands flooded the comments, but none of them were serious, they just wanted the impressions \- So I manufactured the first real deal. I showed MoonPay all the other brands commenting, they said yes, and I used that yes as leverage to close everyone else \- I posted once a day for the first two weeks. Every video told viewers to tag companies, and the more companies joined, the more wanted in \- Then I switched to a flat fee that keeps going up, plus a King of The Throne top spot. So far 25 companies have bought in, spots from $1,000 to $17,000, over $125,000 total, and 100M+ views on my projection mapping videos **Why it's working** \- It's a good story. "Unemployed guy tries to make $1,000,000 from his toilet" is a lot catchier than "experienced marketer makes ads," even though both are true \- I'm the underdog, so the audience sees themselves in it and feels like they could do it too \- It's never been done and it can't be copied. People sell ad space on other things now, but there's only one toilet guy \- People actually want to watch these ads and cheer for the next one. That almost never happens \- The Quality Paradox: the video I spend 5 minutes on beats the one I spend 5 months on. People want the guy figuring it out, not the polished final product **What I learned from working with 30 brands** \- Every brand is different. The hands off ones let me do whatever I want, the hands on ones had specific messaging. I had more fun with the hands off ones \- $10,000 sounds insane for one video until you realize I'm the entire studio: idea, script, design, animation, VFX, marketing. A studio charges $100,000 for that, and the brand gets my audience on top of it **How you can do this too** \- Cold outreach doesn't land brand deals. It works for freelance clients, but brands come to you when you prove yourself \- Views aren't proof. Brands need to see the exact concept they're buying \- Make your own series that involves brands: remake logos, design merch, make fake products, whatever fits you. It has to be yours and you have to actually enjoy it \- Be your own agent. Half of me makes the videos, the other half fights to get them seen \- Take the long shots. I sent dozens of DMs and emails to news stations and media, 99% got ignored. Worst case is a minute of embarrassment, the upside is unlimited \- None of it works if it isn't unapologetically you Hope you enjoyed! Lmk if you have any questions

26 days ago
55· 33%15
r/socialmedia

Is is normal to consult with an expert to help clean up multiple pages and posting flows?

Feel free to direct me to a thread that already answered this… I have tons of content, but my workflow is ass. I’m on apple ecosystem with multiple devices. Need organization and better workflow \-I have \~6 projects(4 bands and 2 events) \-each deserves its own presence for growth on the big 4-TT, YT shorts, IG, FB reels \-flip flopping through the various pages is incredibly disorienting and unproductive \-Content in my iPhone isn’t organized well \-I shoot some content on older iPhones but sending big files is a hassle. Plz advise

about 4 hours ago
34
r/socialmedia

Pls....help me

​ \> Hi everyone, \> \> Does anyone here know how Shopee Buddies makes his Facebook post photo clickable and goes directly to the Shopee app? \> \> When I post my Shopee link on Facebook, my photo is not clickable. It only shows the Shopee preview. \> \> How does he make his custom photo clickable and direct to Shopee? \> \> I attached a screenshot of his post below for reference. \> \> Thank you.

about 8 hours ago
13
r/socialmedia

Facebook Presence as a Professional Solo Musician

I'm a professional musician and currently have the following social media setup: **Facebook Profile:** My Name (@myname) **Facebook Page:** My Name Music (@mynamemusic) **Instagram:** My Name (@myname) Over the years, I've gradually stopped sharing personal content on my Facebook Profile and now pretty much exclusively post music-related content on my Facebook Page. However, as my music career continues to grow, I'd really like to simplify things and have just one Facebook presence, much like I do with Instagram. Ideally, I'd also like to have consistent usernames across both platforms. In an ideal world, Meta would allow you to merge a Profile and a Page into one entity, but unfortunately that's not currently an option. So I'm wondering whether I should: **Option 1:** Keep things as they are, with a personal Profile and a separate music Page. **Option 2:** Switch my personal Profile to Professional Mode, use that as my main music presence, and eventually close the Music Page. The main thing holding me back from Option 2 is that I'd lose years of content from my Music Page, including photos, videos and posts that I'd really like to preserve. I also don't want to lose the audience I've built there. Has anyone made this switch? Is Professional Mode a genuinely good alternative to running a Facebook Page as a professional musician? I'd particularly appreciate hearing from anyone who's consolidated their Facebook presence in this way, and whether they've regretted it or found it a better way of managing their social media. What would you do in my position?

about 8 hours ago
34