You don't have a content problem. You have a research problem.

I run social media for three businesses: a marketing agency, a SaaS analytics product, and my own personal brand. For a long time, the hardest part wasn't writing the content; it was figuring out what to write about. Every week, I had to start from scratch. Trying to think of something relevant. And would end up recycling the same angles or posting something that doesn't land.

For me, the fix wasn't more creativity; it was building out a proper research system.

The two main sources I found very useful are Reddit and LinkedIn groups relevant to each business. And tbh Reddit ended up being way more useful than I expected. LinkedIn groups trend heavily toward self-promotion and broad takes. Reddit surfaces real conversations, real frustrations, real wins from people who are actually in the weeds.

What I look for in both of these platforms is specific:

Posts with high engagement that share a real result. Not "here's my opinion on X" but "I tried X and here's exactly what happened." Those tell you what your audience cares about enough to respond. And they give you something concrete to build from.

Posts with "what NOT to do" framing. These perform consistently because they validate frustrations people already have. If someone in a relevant subreddit is venting about a mistake, that's a content idea. People read those because they've made the same mistake or are afraid of making it.

Posts where the comments are doing the heavy lifting. Sometimes the original post is fine, but the comment section has pure gold inside of it.

Now here's where it gets more structured. I built a Claude Code skill called /content-research that I run during every research session. The way it works: I paste in a post or thread. It evaluates against those criteria and returns a verdict. Approved, Flagged, or Rejected. The skill tracks every verdict through the session and at the end outputs a clean table: post, source, verdict, and why. So I end every session knowing exactly what cleared and what didn't, with reasoning attached.

The Notion side is two databases. An Approved Posts Inbox for anything that clears the criteria. Each entry has the source, platform, why it passed, and what content angle it unlocks. A Flagged Posts Log for the borderline ones, with a Second Chance Review checkbox. So I can come back with fresh eyes instead of making a rushed call. The inbox is what I pull from when it's time to actually produce content.

One thing that made this more efficient than I expected. The same research sources feed content for all three businesses. The agency content is about what clients are struggling with in marketing. The SaaS product content is about the reporting and analytics problems those same clients have. One Reddit thread can generate ideas for both angles without doubling the research effort. That was an unplanned benefit but it basically halved the weekly time cost.

The whole system takes about 90 minutes a week and generates more approved ideas than I can use. Through this, what I learned is that most of the content research problem comes down to two things. No defined place to look and no defined criteria for what you're finding. Once both exist, the rest is mechanical.

If anyone wants the Claude Code skill or the Notion template, drop a comment and I'll share them. Happy to open-source both.

Comments

AutoModerator3 months ago1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Designer_Abies_443 months ago1

I went through the same “blank calendar every week” loop until I treated Reddit as the primary research hub, not inspiration fluff. What helped a ton was adding one more layer on top of what you’re doing: I tag each saved thread by “stage” (problem-aware, solution-aware, vendor-comparison) and “persona,” then force every post to be tied to a single stage + single persona. Makes it way easier to avoid generic takes.

I also started reverse-engineering high-comment replies instead of just the OP. If a comment keeps getting quoted or debated, I’ll turn that into a post frame like “X vs Y” or “why people hate Z.” Hypefury and Taplio are fine for scheduling, but I ended up on Pulse for Reddit after trying those plus Brand24 because Pulse for Reddit caught threads I was missing where people were literally asking for what we sell. The combo of your kind of system plus that kind of targeting made content ideas feel almost unfair.

ravenz0r18223 months ago1

I think you're spot on about 2 things.

1 - Shortening the research time

2 - Having a structured approach to workflow

You created a nice personal fix using both Claude and Notion to vet content which I admire.

I needed a similar solution for tiktok, reels and shorts but found a simpler way to do it by training AI to my niche/brand and incorporating live trend analytics (google, youtube, tiktok, reddit). Both criteria vet ideas which are then receive hooks and finally multi-platform scripting. I built this into an app (FlowCast) and I'm proud to say I'm reaching the final commercial stages with it currently in free public beta testing. Anyone is welcome to join, just DM me.

ContentClawz3 months ago1

the stage tagging is the part most people skip. problem-aware and solution-aware aren't just audience labels, they're basically dictating your hook before you write a single word. same thread, same research, completely different angle depending on which stage you're writing for. that's doing a lot of the creative work before you even open a doc. the comment section mining point is underrated too. the OP signals what's interesting, but the comment with 40 replies that nobody turned into a standalone post is where the real angle lives.

MiddleRegular6233 months ago1

This viewpoint is nice additionally i have found that determining what truly resonates is more difficult than producing content

Autopreneur_net3 months ago1

Awesome. Thankx for sharing. I will apply some of the tips you mentioned.

More like this

EVERYTHING ABOUT THE INSTAGRAM ALGORITHM IN 2026

When you post, Instagram doesn't evaluate your content all at once. Distribution is continuous and adaptive. The system is constantly re-ranking your post based on signals it collects over time. Early engagement matters a lot, but posts can pick up hours or even days later, especially Reels. It's not a single batch test. It's an ongoing one. What you need to understand is that the algorithm is always watching the same core signals, and most people are optimizing for the wrong ones. **What actually moves the needle** Instagram's CEO confirmed this year that three signals are driving distribution more than anything else right now. Watch time is number one by a significant margin. Viewers decide within about 1.7 seconds whether to keep watching. If people are dropping off in the first 3 seconds, your post dies. If they make it past 50%, that's a strong signal. If they rewatch, that's explosive. Your retention curve is more important than your like count, full stop. Second is likes per reach, meaning the percentage of people who actually liked your post out of everyone who saw it. This matters more for reaching your existing followers than for growing to new audiences. Third, and this is the one most people are underestimating, is DM shares. When someone sends your post to a friend, Instagram treats it as a stronger endorsement than a like or even a comment. It signals that your content is worth recommending to strangers. Every post should have a built-in "send this to someone who needs it" moment, intentionally. If you're still optimizing primarily for likes in 2026, you're behind. **The format breakdown** Reels are for reaching new people. Carousels and photos are for your existing followers. Stories are for keeping those followers from leaving. They're not interchangeable. They serve completely different purposes in the algorithm. Carousels are underrated right now. Instagram does re-rank posts over time, which means a carousel that didn't land on the first impression can get another shot. The takeaway: make every slide worth stopping on, not just the first. Stories aren't optional if retention matters to you. Accounts that post consistently to Stories see meaningfully fewer unfollows. Stories keep your existing audience warm while your Reels pull new people in. **What you should actually be doing** Forget posting volume targets. Quality is the prerequisite. High frequency with low quality lowers your retention metrics and actively hurts your distribution. Run this instead: Every day: one high-quality Reel with a hook in the first 2 seconds and a clear share trigger built in, plus 3 to 5 Story frames to stay visible and keep your audience connected. Three to four times a week: a carousel optimized for saves and shares, something educational, useful, or worth returning to. Every single post should pass three checks before it goes out. Does the hook land in under 2 seconds? Is there one clear idea? Is there a reason someone would send this to a friend? **On niche consistency** Your last 9 to 12 posts define how Instagram categorizes your account. The algorithm rewards tight topic focus and punishes accounts that drift between unrelated content. Whatever angle you've built your account around, stay in it consistently. It's not about being in a broad niche. It's about having a distinct point of view within one. A hundred fitness creators exist. Only a few have a perspective that's immediately recognizable. That's the real differentiator. **Where I've seen this work** I grew from 100 followers to 360k using these principles. Grew 10+ accounts from 0 to 10k and sold most of them. The process was the same every time: understand what the algorithm is currently rewarding, make content that earns retention and shares, stay consistent for months not weeks, and adjust based on what the data tells you. It's not exciting. It's a system. Systems win. **TLDR** This post blew up last time so I'm bringing it back with answers to the most common questions I got. Before anything else, few things I wish someone told me earlier: 1. **Consistency** is the only thing that actually matters. I know everyone says this and everyone ignores it. That's literally why most people fail. The people winning are not smarter than you, they just didn't quit. 2. Video quality matters more than most people admit. Drop CapCut, get Adobe Premiere or hire an editor. Skip Fiverr, find editors in **Discord communities** instead, way cheaper and actually good. 3. Stop wasting hours on scripts, hooks, and hunting for content ideas manually. I use **SocialHunt** for all of that. You can train it on viral content in your niche and it handles the research and scripting side so you can just focus on filming. 4. Use **Superflow** to handle distribution, workflows, and repetitive ops. If you’re doing things manually, you’re capping growth.

3 months ago
255

Any people that runs 100 to 10k followers pages (any social media)?

Hey all, I own a business that involves many clients that promote their product, art or website with TikTok (also Instagram, Youtube and Facebook). I want to offer them a way to post their content, or to get content created and posted for them on existing TikTok pages. Basically you got pages in a specific theme (sport, anime, cinema, culture, memes...) and you rent it for a specific period of time. You get paid every month, and all you have to do is basically connecting the account once to our system. You can opt-out anytime you want, you keep the full ownership of the account. That's basically a way to monetize your pages passively. For now I'm doing it myself with my own pages (3 tiktok pages with 500 to 3k followers, and 1 6k subscribers Youtube channel), I made around $800 renting these for less than a month. If someone is interested, please comment or DM!

3 months ago
222

Everything dying at 300 views for so long before I finally caught the problem

I've been absolutely obsessed with short form content for the last two years. Like people have staged actual interventions about my health level of obsessed. I'm talking 11-14 hour days breaking down what separates successful videos from failures, experimenting with different hook variations, rewriting scripts until my brain hurts, testing every editing approach I could possibly get my hands on. Why this level of obsession? Because I'm absolutely certain short form video is the backbone of everything right now. Growing followers, selling anything, generating opportunities, creating brands from nothing. Every part of it depends on whether you can hold someone's attention for 30 seconds. But here's what nearly made me quit entirely: despite the constant daily grind, nothing was hitting. I'd pour 7-8 hours into crafting one video only to watch it crash at 300 views. Tried every tactic from every person claiming to have figured it out. Bought their courses. Applied their "proven" methods. Still going nowhere. I seriously started thinking maybe I'm just not the type of person who can make this work. Like maybe there's some fundamental ability I'm completely lacking. Then something clicked. I'm grinding constantly, but I'm operating completely blind. I don't actually know what's broken. I'm essentially just trying random things hoping something eventually works. So I stopped hunting for some mythical viral code and started analyzing actual data. Analyzed my last 50 videos second by second, documented every retention drop, and discovered 5 consistent patterns that were systematically killing my performance: 1. **Vague mysterious hooks are totally invisible** "This will transform you..." gets scrolled past every time. But "I used resistance bands for 55 days and my shoulder mobility actually decreased" stops people mid scroll. Specific concrete details destroy vague teasing without exception. 2. **Seconds 5-7 are where everything gets decided** Most viewers leave between 4-7 seconds if you haven't proven it's worth watching. I was creating slow buildups like a complete amateur. Now my strongest visual or most compelling number arrives exactly at second 5. That's where the hook that genuinely holds people. 3. **Any gap beyond 1 second absolutely kills your retention** Tracked this obsessively, anything past 1.2 seconds makes people think the video stopped. What feels like natural comfortable pacing to you reads as complete dead time to someone scrolling. Cut significantly tighter than feels normal. 4. **Visual variety is absolutely critical** If nothing changes on screen for more than 3 seconds, attention vanishes without warning. I started constantly rotating camera angles, cutting to b-roll, moving text placement, literally anything to maintain constant visual movement. Went from losing 50% at the halfway mark to keeping 70%. 5. **Rewatch rate is dramatically more important than most people realize** Videos people watch more than once get pushed exponentially harder by the algorithm. Started planting subtle details that aren't obvious first viewing, editing faster, adding elements worth discovering on rewatch. Rewatch percentage jumped from 8% to 31% and reach went completely through the roof. Honestly the biggest shift was abandoning all guesswork and actually measuring what was happening at every second. Came across this one app that goes way beyond showing where people drop off, it literally tells you why and exactly how to correct it. That's when everything transformed. Went from averaging 300 views to hitting 18k in about 4 weeks. Regular analytics show you people are leaving. This one shows the exact second, the actual reason, and what to adjust before your next post. If you're uploading consistently but stuck below 1k views, your content isn't the problem. You just don't know what's genuinely working versus what you assume is working. Listen, I'm sharing this because breaking through was honestly one of the hardest things I've tackled. I really wish someone had just explained exactly what needed fixing when I was stuck there. Would have saved months of confusion and doubt. So that's what I'm doing now for anyone who needs it.

4 months ago
221