How would the internet change if social media platforms were legally required to prove their "active user" counts didn't include known bot farms?

A Final Appeal to X , And Why It Probably Won't Matter

Just submitted what will almost certainly be my last appeal to X (formerly Twitter) to restore my suspended account. I want to be transparent about the full story, because I think it matters beyond just my situation.

My account was Premium+, photo-ID verified, and had grown to nearly 10,000 followers. My profile made no secret of my focus: ethics and platform accountability. I wasn't hiding what I was doing or who I was.

What I believe happened and why it's bigger than me

I reported a Russian-operated website that openly sells X/Twitter accounts in bulk , thousands of them. This isn't a gray area. It's a direct violation of X's own Terms of Service, and almost certainly a violation of U.S. federal law. I reported it through X's own reporting tools, then filed formal complaints with the FTC and the FBI's IC3 portal.

At the request of federal authorities who have since contacted me, I'm not naming the site publicly. Making it widely known would inadvertently drive traffic and new clients to it , the opposite of what we want.

X's response to my reports? Complete silence. Not even a courtesy acknowledgment. Think about that for a moment: a verified, paying user reports what appears to be a large-scale criminal operation targeting X's own platform, and the company can't manage a single automated "thank you, we'll look into it." Any legitimate business , a bank, a retailer, even a mid-sized tech startup would at minimum acknowledge a report of criminal activity aimed at them. X's silence isn't just rude. It's a data point.

Here's my honest suspicion, and I think many of you share it

Early on, even Grok , X's own AI, acknowledged what many observers have long suspected: X has a financial incentive to let bot accounts flourish. Bots drive engagement numbers. Engagement numbers drive advertising revenue. A platform that quietly tolerates a thriving black market in fake accounts isn't just negligent , it may be complicit. I'm not stating that as a proven fact. I'm stating it as a reasonable hypothesis that deserves a serious federal investigation.

The pattern here is worth naming clearly: a user reports what looks like organized fraud, gets no response, and then gets suspended. Maybe that's coincidence. Maybe it isn't. I genuinely don't know. But the optics are terrible, and X's refusal to engage with any of it makes the innocent explanation harder to believe.

Where things stand now

I've made my appeal. If X restores my account, I'll continue doing exactly what I was doing , holding the platform to the same standards of transparency and integrity I expect from any institution that claims to value free speech. I'd genuinely prefer that outcome. My verified audience was there, and that work had momentum.

If X doesn't restore it, that tells you something too.

Either way, I'm not stopping. I'm actively urging federal, state, and international authorities to investigate the operation I reported , including any potential coordination or willful inaction on X's part. This is going to be a public campaign, and I intend to document it carefully.

Where to find me and follow this

I've already been building on healthier ground:

  • BlueSky come find me there
  • Mastodon  decentralized, resilient, and growing fast
  • Reddit  including r/Twitter**Exiles**, a community that's bigger every week for reasons that should surprise no one
  • Medium  where I'll be writing longer, more detailed pieces on platform accountability as this develops

A final thought

This was never really about my account. It's about whether a platform that wraps itself in the language of free speech is actually willing to apply that principle honestly , even when accountability is pointed in its own direction. That's the test. It's not a hard test. But so far, X is failing it.

I'll update everyone on X's response , or, more likely, the continued absence of one.

Thank you to everyone who has followed this across platforms. The support and feedback genuinely matter, especially as we all figure out what a trustworthy social media landscape is even supposed to look like anymore.

Comments

AutoModerator3 months ago1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Acceptable-Bat-95773 months ago1

Elon Musk has personally doxxed, attacked, and harassed his own users. Who is this appeal to? Fuhrer Elon already knows what’s going on. He supports it.

More like this

EVERYTHING ABOUT THE INSTAGRAM ALGORITHM IN 2026

When you post, Instagram doesn't evaluate your content all at once. Distribution is continuous and adaptive. The system is constantly re-ranking your post based on signals it collects over time. Early engagement matters a lot, but posts can pick up hours or even days later, especially Reels. It's not a single batch test. It's an ongoing one. What you need to understand is that the algorithm is always watching the same core signals, and most people are optimizing for the wrong ones. **What actually moves the needle** Instagram's CEO confirmed this year that three signals are driving distribution more than anything else right now. Watch time is number one by a significant margin. Viewers decide within about 1.7 seconds whether to keep watching. If people are dropping off in the first 3 seconds, your post dies. If they make it past 50%, that's a strong signal. If they rewatch, that's explosive. Your retention curve is more important than your like count, full stop. Second is likes per reach, meaning the percentage of people who actually liked your post out of everyone who saw it. This matters more for reaching your existing followers than for growing to new audiences. Third, and this is the one most people are underestimating, is DM shares. When someone sends your post to a friend, Instagram treats it as a stronger endorsement than a like or even a comment. It signals that your content is worth recommending to strangers. Every post should have a built-in "send this to someone who needs it" moment, intentionally. If you're still optimizing primarily for likes in 2026, you're behind. **The format breakdown** Reels are for reaching new people. Carousels and photos are for your existing followers. Stories are for keeping those followers from leaving. They're not interchangeable. They serve completely different purposes in the algorithm. Carousels are underrated right now. Instagram does re-rank posts over time, which means a carousel that didn't land on the first impression can get another shot. The takeaway: make every slide worth stopping on, not just the first. Stories aren't optional if retention matters to you. Accounts that post consistently to Stories see meaningfully fewer unfollows. Stories keep your existing audience warm while your Reels pull new people in. **What you should actually be doing** Forget posting volume targets. Quality is the prerequisite. High frequency with low quality lowers your retention metrics and actively hurts your distribution. Run this instead: Every day: one high-quality Reel with a hook in the first 2 seconds and a clear share trigger built in, plus 3 to 5 Story frames to stay visible and keep your audience connected. Three to four times a week: a carousel optimized for saves and shares, something educational, useful, or worth returning to. Every single post should pass three checks before it goes out. Does the hook land in under 2 seconds? Is there one clear idea? Is there a reason someone would send this to a friend? **On niche consistency** Your last 9 to 12 posts define how Instagram categorizes your account. The algorithm rewards tight topic focus and punishes accounts that drift between unrelated content. Whatever angle you've built your account around, stay in it consistently. It's not about being in a broad niche. It's about having a distinct point of view within one. A hundred fitness creators exist. Only a few have a perspective that's immediately recognizable. That's the real differentiator. **Where I've seen this work** I grew from 100 followers to 360k using these principles. Grew 10+ accounts from 0 to 10k and sold most of them. The process was the same every time: understand what the algorithm is currently rewarding, make content that earns retention and shares, stay consistent for months not weeks, and adjust based on what the data tells you. It's not exciting. It's a system. Systems win. **TLDR** This post blew up last time so I'm bringing it back with answers to the most common questions I got. Before anything else, few things I wish someone told me earlier: 1. **Consistency** is the only thing that actually matters. I know everyone says this and everyone ignores it. That's literally why most people fail. The people winning are not smarter than you, they just didn't quit. 2. Video quality matters more than most people admit. Drop CapCut, get Adobe Premiere or hire an editor. Skip Fiverr, find editors in **Discord communities** instead, way cheaper and actually good. 3. Stop wasting hours on scripts, hooks, and hunting for content ideas manually. I use **SocialHunt** for all of that. You can train it on viral content in your niche and it handles the research and scripting side so you can just focus on filming. 4. Use **Superflow** to handle distribution, workflows, and repetitive ops. If you’re doing things manually, you’re capping growth.

3 months ago
255

Any people that runs 100 to 10k followers pages (any social media)?

Hey all, I own a business that involves many clients that promote their product, art or website with TikTok (also Instagram, Youtube and Facebook). I want to offer them a way to post their content, or to get content created and posted for them on existing TikTok pages. Basically you got pages in a specific theme (sport, anime, cinema, culture, memes...) and you rent it for a specific period of time. You get paid every month, and all you have to do is basically connecting the account once to our system. You can opt-out anytime you want, you keep the full ownership of the account. That's basically a way to monetize your pages passively. For now I'm doing it myself with my own pages (3 tiktok pages with 500 to 3k followers, and 1 6k subscribers Youtube channel), I made around $800 renting these for less than a month. If someone is interested, please comment or DM!

3 months ago
222

Everything dying at 300 views for so long before I finally caught the problem

I've been absolutely obsessed with short form content for the last two years. Like people have staged actual interventions about my health level of obsessed. I'm talking 11-14 hour days breaking down what separates successful videos from failures, experimenting with different hook variations, rewriting scripts until my brain hurts, testing every editing approach I could possibly get my hands on. Why this level of obsession? Because I'm absolutely certain short form video is the backbone of everything right now. Growing followers, selling anything, generating opportunities, creating brands from nothing. Every part of it depends on whether you can hold someone's attention for 30 seconds. But here's what nearly made me quit entirely: despite the constant daily grind, nothing was hitting. I'd pour 7-8 hours into crafting one video only to watch it crash at 300 views. Tried every tactic from every person claiming to have figured it out. Bought their courses. Applied their "proven" methods. Still going nowhere. I seriously started thinking maybe I'm just not the type of person who can make this work. Like maybe there's some fundamental ability I'm completely lacking. Then something clicked. I'm grinding constantly, but I'm operating completely blind. I don't actually know what's broken. I'm essentially just trying random things hoping something eventually works. So I stopped hunting for some mythical viral code and started analyzing actual data. Analyzed my last 50 videos second by second, documented every retention drop, and discovered 5 consistent patterns that were systematically killing my performance: 1. **Vague mysterious hooks are totally invisible** "This will transform you..." gets scrolled past every time. But "I used resistance bands for 55 days and my shoulder mobility actually decreased" stops people mid scroll. Specific concrete details destroy vague teasing without exception. 2. **Seconds 5-7 are where everything gets decided** Most viewers leave between 4-7 seconds if you haven't proven it's worth watching. I was creating slow buildups like a complete amateur. Now my strongest visual or most compelling number arrives exactly at second 5. That's where the hook that genuinely holds people. 3. **Any gap beyond 1 second absolutely kills your retention** Tracked this obsessively, anything past 1.2 seconds makes people think the video stopped. What feels like natural comfortable pacing to you reads as complete dead time to someone scrolling. Cut significantly tighter than feels normal. 4. **Visual variety is absolutely critical** If nothing changes on screen for more than 3 seconds, attention vanishes without warning. I started constantly rotating camera angles, cutting to b-roll, moving text placement, literally anything to maintain constant visual movement. Went from losing 50% at the halfway mark to keeping 70%. 5. **Rewatch rate is dramatically more important than most people realize** Videos people watch more than once get pushed exponentially harder by the algorithm. Started planting subtle details that aren't obvious first viewing, editing faster, adding elements worth discovering on rewatch. Rewatch percentage jumped from 8% to 31% and reach went completely through the roof. Honestly the biggest shift was abandoning all guesswork and actually measuring what was happening at every second. Came across this one app that goes way beyond showing where people drop off, it literally tells you why and exactly how to correct it. That's when everything transformed. Went from averaging 300 views to hitting 18k in about 4 weeks. Regular analytics show you people are leaving. This one shows the exact second, the actual reason, and what to adjust before your next post. If you're uploading consistently but stuck below 1k views, your content isn't the problem. You just don't know what's genuinely working versus what you assume is working. Listen, I'm sharing this because breaking through was honestly one of the hardest things I've tackled. I really wish someone had just explained exactly what needed fixing when I was stuck there. Would have saved months of confusion and doubt. So that's what I'm doing now for anyone who needs it.

4 months ago
221