I created a free monetized social network to help preserve the bond between creators and their fans (not promo)

First, I want to make it clear that I’m not selling anything. The platform is free, and monetization comes from advertising.

I’m not posting here to promote it, but to get objective feedback on the concept and to understand how I could present it to content creators who might genuinely be interested.

Today, I feel like many creators are forced to follow trends, imposed formats, and algorithmic logic. Too often, isolated pieces of content are valued more than the actual personality of the creator behind them. As a result, many creators end up protecting themselves, filtering what they show, and slowly moving away from the simple relationship they used to have with their audience.

I created a social network to try to preserve that bond.

With the rise of mass AI-generated content, I think this problem may become even more important. It will become harder to distinguish content that is truly personal and embodied from content produced only to capture attention.

On this platform, creators publish content in the form of threads, which unlock directly on their profile. This format makes it possible to showcase all types of content, including text, images, videos, audio, and links, without forcing creators into one single format dictated by an algorithm.

There is no recommendation algorithm. Creators are mainly seen by people who already know them and actively choose to visit their profile and view their content.

The platform is free, includes advertising, and allows creators to be monetized from the moment they sign up, with no follower threshold and without making their audience pay directly. Fans don’t need to create an account to unlock creators’ content. Only the app is required.

The goal is to create a freer, more natural space where creators can feel closer to the people who follow them.

I believe I can’t mention the name of my platform without breaking this subreddit’s rules.

I’d really appreciate your thoughts on this.

Do you think this concept could appeal to creators?

What types of creators do you think it would resonate with the most?

And how could I present it to creators without falling into a heavy promotional approach that would go against the idea of building a healthier social network?

Comments

kBayyyk_233226 days ago2

So I'm actually interested.

The no algorithm for finding new content is a double edged sword for sure, but as a suggestion, possibly create a search function based on tags. Creators can add tags that fit their community and users can search for new creators based on tags. I also think a "share" feature would be beneficial if you follow a creator and want to share their page with your friends.

Do you have anything in place for moderation, or bot-account control.?

I'd actually be interested in reading the terms and conditions for use and seeing if it's an outlet I'd like to join. Can you dm the name to me?

Evening_Hawk_747026 days ago1

If creators have to bring their own audience to a platform with zero organic discovery, they will choose direct monetization on Patreon over splitting ad pennies on a new app.

ickN26 days ago1

“Creators are seen by people who already know them” - no thanks. If you don’t have a recommendation algorithm to bring attention to creators we won’t participate. Also, why would I move people from the platform that pays me to a platform that doesn’t?

AutoModerator26 days ago1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

ceciliaatraan25 days ago1

I think it could appeal, but probably not to creators who see every platform mainly as a discovery engine.

If creators have to bring their own audience, the pitch needs to be less “new social network” and more “owned-feeling fan space without paywall friction.” That might resonate more with creators who already have a loyal niche audience: educators, writers, podcasters, artists, local/community creators, or anyone whose content is more relationship-based than trend-based.

The weak point is still creator motivation. Ad revenue with no follower threshold sounds nice, but unless the earnings are meaningful, it may not be enough reason to move people from Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Patreon, Substack, etc. I’d be very concrete when presenting it: who it is for, what they post there that they would not post elsewhere, and what a realistic creator can expect from it.

That said, the “no algorithm” angle is interesting if you frame it as intentional distribution to existing fans, not as a replacement for discovery.

teentitledanonymous25 days ago1

This is a very interesting concept, and I was thinking about (not making a social media platform for content creators like you have) but another decentralized platform where the circle is only people who you know, whether online or real life. This is definitely something that I would consider if the security and privacy are prioritized.

I'm not a big content creator so the prospect of not having to build a huge following before getting monetized is intriguing.

Could you expand on the privacy policies in place to protect people's information and what security protocols are used to ensure that passwords are safe? Is there an MFA? Do you have to show where you are located? If yes to the last question, please consider allowing creators to choose what information they are comfortable sharing. For instance, I do not want my phone number, email, zip code, or any PI that could allow nefarious people from tracking me down. Not that I have stalkers, but it's just such a concern now with so little privacy online.

Thank you for putting in the hard work! I would love to see if my friends who also make content would be interested in this as well, please let me know how to learn more!

Vidhmo26 days ago1

the no-algorithm, profile-visit based discovery model is a real differentiator but also the biggest adoption challenge. creators are used to algorithms doing distribution work for them, asking them to rely purely on existing audience finding them feels like a step backward even if the underlying philosophy is better.

the creators most likely to resonate are ones who already have an established audience elsewhere and are tired of algorithm dependency, not creators trying to grow from zero. early adopters will probably be people with some existing following who want a place that feels less performative.

for presenting it without sounding heavily promotional, framing it as "a space for your existing fans" rather than "a new platform to grow on" matches the actual value prop better. growth platforms get pitched on reach, this needs to be pitched on depth of relationship with people who already care.

More like this

EVERYTHING ABOUT THE INSTAGRAM ALGORITHM IN 2026

When you post, Instagram doesn't evaluate your content all at once. Distribution is continuous and adaptive. The system is constantly re-ranking your post based on signals it collects over time. Early engagement matters a lot, but posts can pick up hours or even days later, especially Reels. It's not a single batch test. It's an ongoing one. What you need to understand is that the algorithm is always watching the same core signals, and most people are optimizing for the wrong ones. **What actually moves the needle** Instagram's CEO confirmed this year that three signals are driving distribution more than anything else right now. Watch time is number one by a significant margin. Viewers decide within about 1.7 seconds whether to keep watching. If people are dropping off in the first 3 seconds, your post dies. If they make it past 50%, that's a strong signal. If they rewatch, that's explosive. Your retention curve is more important than your like count, full stop. Second is likes per reach, meaning the percentage of people who actually liked your post out of everyone who saw it. This matters more for reaching your existing followers than for growing to new audiences. Third, and this is the one most people are underestimating, is DM shares. When someone sends your post to a friend, Instagram treats it as a stronger endorsement than a like or even a comment. It signals that your content is worth recommending to strangers. Every post should have a built-in "send this to someone who needs it" moment, intentionally. If you're still optimizing primarily for likes in 2026, you're behind. **The format breakdown** Reels are for reaching new people. Carousels and photos are for your existing followers. Stories are for keeping those followers from leaving. They're not interchangeable. They serve completely different purposes in the algorithm. Carousels are underrated right now. Instagram does re-rank posts over time, which means a carousel that didn't land on the first impression can get another shot. The takeaway: make every slide worth stopping on, not just the first. Stories aren't optional if retention matters to you. Accounts that post consistently to Stories see meaningfully fewer unfollows. Stories keep your existing audience warm while your Reels pull new people in. **What you should actually be doing** Forget posting volume targets. Quality is the prerequisite. High frequency with low quality lowers your retention metrics and actively hurts your distribution. Run this instead: Every day: one high-quality Reel with a hook in the first 2 seconds and a clear share trigger built in, plus 3 to 5 Story frames to stay visible and keep your audience connected. Three to four times a week: a carousel optimized for saves and shares, something educational, useful, or worth returning to. Every single post should pass three checks before it goes out. Does the hook land in under 2 seconds? Is there one clear idea? Is there a reason someone would send this to a friend? **On niche consistency** Your last 9 to 12 posts define how Instagram categorizes your account. The algorithm rewards tight topic focus and punishes accounts that drift between unrelated content. Whatever angle you've built your account around, stay in it consistently. It's not about being in a broad niche. It's about having a distinct point of view within one. A hundred fitness creators exist. Only a few have a perspective that's immediately recognizable. That's the real differentiator. **Where I've seen this work** I grew from 100 followers to 360k using these principles. Grew 10+ accounts from 0 to 10k and sold most of them. The process was the same every time: understand what the algorithm is currently rewarding, make content that earns retention and shares, stay consistent for months not weeks, and adjust based on what the data tells you. It's not exciting. It's a system. Systems win. **TLDR** This post blew up last time so I'm bringing it back with answers to the most common questions I got. Before anything else, few things I wish someone told me earlier: 1. **Consistency** is the only thing that actually matters. I know everyone says this and everyone ignores it. That's literally why most people fail. The people winning are not smarter than you, they just didn't quit. 2. Video quality matters more than most people admit. Drop CapCut, get Adobe Premiere or hire an editor. Skip Fiverr, find editors in **Discord communities** instead, way cheaper and actually good. 3. Stop wasting hours on scripts, hooks, and hunting for content ideas manually. I use **SocialHunt** for all of that. You can train it on viral content in your niche and it handles the research and scripting side so you can just focus on filming. 4. Use **Superflow** to handle distribution, workflows, and repetitive ops. If you’re doing things manually, you’re capping growth.

3 months ago
255

Any people that runs 100 to 10k followers pages (any social media)?

Hey all, I own a business that involves many clients that promote their product, art or website with TikTok (also Instagram, Youtube and Facebook). I want to offer them a way to post their content, or to get content created and posted for them on existing TikTok pages. Basically you got pages in a specific theme (sport, anime, cinema, culture, memes...) and you rent it for a specific period of time. You get paid every month, and all you have to do is basically connecting the account once to our system. You can opt-out anytime you want, you keep the full ownership of the account. That's basically a way to monetize your pages passively. For now I'm doing it myself with my own pages (3 tiktok pages with 500 to 3k followers, and 1 6k subscribers Youtube channel), I made around $800 renting these for less than a month. If someone is interested, please comment or DM!

3 months ago
222

Everything dying at 300 views for so long before I finally caught the problem

I've been absolutely obsessed with short form content for the last two years. Like people have staged actual interventions about my health level of obsessed. I'm talking 11-14 hour days breaking down what separates successful videos from failures, experimenting with different hook variations, rewriting scripts until my brain hurts, testing every editing approach I could possibly get my hands on. Why this level of obsession? Because I'm absolutely certain short form video is the backbone of everything right now. Growing followers, selling anything, generating opportunities, creating brands from nothing. Every part of it depends on whether you can hold someone's attention for 30 seconds. But here's what nearly made me quit entirely: despite the constant daily grind, nothing was hitting. I'd pour 7-8 hours into crafting one video only to watch it crash at 300 views. Tried every tactic from every person claiming to have figured it out. Bought their courses. Applied their "proven" methods. Still going nowhere. I seriously started thinking maybe I'm just not the type of person who can make this work. Like maybe there's some fundamental ability I'm completely lacking. Then something clicked. I'm grinding constantly, but I'm operating completely blind. I don't actually know what's broken. I'm essentially just trying random things hoping something eventually works. So I stopped hunting for some mythical viral code and started analyzing actual data. Analyzed my last 50 videos second by second, documented every retention drop, and discovered 5 consistent patterns that were systematically killing my performance: 1. **Vague mysterious hooks are totally invisible** "This will transform you..." gets scrolled past every time. But "I used resistance bands for 55 days and my shoulder mobility actually decreased" stops people mid scroll. Specific concrete details destroy vague teasing without exception. 2. **Seconds 5-7 are where everything gets decided** Most viewers leave between 4-7 seconds if you haven't proven it's worth watching. I was creating slow buildups like a complete amateur. Now my strongest visual or most compelling number arrives exactly at second 5. That's where the hook that genuinely holds people. 3. **Any gap beyond 1 second absolutely kills your retention** Tracked this obsessively, anything past 1.2 seconds makes people think the video stopped. What feels like natural comfortable pacing to you reads as complete dead time to someone scrolling. Cut significantly tighter than feels normal. 4. **Visual variety is absolutely critical** If nothing changes on screen for more than 3 seconds, attention vanishes without warning. I started constantly rotating camera angles, cutting to b-roll, moving text placement, literally anything to maintain constant visual movement. Went from losing 50% at the halfway mark to keeping 70%. 5. **Rewatch rate is dramatically more important than most people realize** Videos people watch more than once get pushed exponentially harder by the algorithm. Started planting subtle details that aren't obvious first viewing, editing faster, adding elements worth discovering on rewatch. Rewatch percentage jumped from 8% to 31% and reach went completely through the roof. Honestly the biggest shift was abandoning all guesswork and actually measuring what was happening at every second. Came across this one app that goes way beyond showing where people drop off, it literally tells you why and exactly how to correct it. That's when everything transformed. Went from averaging 300 views to hitting 18k in about 4 weeks. Regular analytics show you people are leaving. This one shows the exact second, the actual reason, and what to adjust before your next post. If you're uploading consistently but stuck below 1k views, your content isn't the problem. You just don't know what's genuinely working versus what you assume is working. Listen, I'm sharing this because breaking through was honestly one of the hardest things I've tackled. I really wish someone had just explained exactly what needed fixing when I was stuck there. Would have saved months of confusion and doubt. So that's what I'm doing now for anyone who needs it.

4 months ago
221