评论

Dry-Illustrator-250•about 20 hours ago•165

Orphan eating monster isn’t speaking fast enough or over the orphans

No-Tradition-9542•about 20 hours ago•87

With a lot of the videos I think the crowd is usually crazier than the speaker. They usually bring in influencers.

ProgramConnect8206•about 20 hours ago•74

This would be more accurate if they were just talking over each other the whole time.

ThatTallBrendan•about 13 hours ago•28

https://preview.redd.it/dy447koxnlrh1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1f69acdb18079e7421466104f71ae28da2daf9dd

Pathetian•about 15 hours ago•23

I've only ever seen clips of this type of content, but isn't it usually 1 smart person and 20 morons? Like, regardless of ideology they just find 20 people who can barely understand their own stance right? I can't imagine it would be interesting with 20 smart people and 1 dumbass.

DingusKhan9164•about 20 hours ago•15

This is silly as fuck you’re just mad the right wingers get schooled by someone smarter every time

Unintended-Nostalgia•about 13 hours ago•11

I mean... the orphan didn't really bring in any facts or data to back up his argument...soooo...

..../s

BladeOfWoah•about 14 hours ago•7

The most annoying thing about those videos is whenever the person in the middle makes a good point, the idiots on the outside press the buzzer to swap to another idiot.

That way they don't need to defend their previous stupid point that just got refuted and can just jump to another question.

BrainBurnFallouti•about 11 hours ago•6

Actual conversation I had once:

Me: "I know that 12yo kids get crushes on their teacher -but [Show] showing the teacher reciprocating these feelings is INCREDIBLY fucked up! Especially in a show for kids/teens!"

Dude: "Why?"

Me: "...because it literally normalizes grooming? Pedophilia??"

Dude: "Ok. But. Do you have a source that this happened? That [Show] led to grooming of kids?"

Me: "No? But I can show you tons of studies regarding child developement, abuse & media influence? Why we have have age-ratings per se??"

Dude: "Ok. But if nothing happened you can't say it's bad/shouldn't be shown to kids. I mean. It's just fictional. Who cares?"

Me: *breaths *🙏

Like. It's not even the topic itself. Just the argument: You can't call it bad/dangerous, until someone dies/gets harmed from it.

scrapy_the_scrap•about 14 hours ago•5

Dr mike vs antivaxxera

Not even paraphrased

He said that word for word

He ate all of them

It was fucked up