Monthly reporting is mostly the same structure with different numbers and examples. Has anyone found a way to automate the presentation while still highlighting the interesting changes from month to month?
AI is fine for assembling the deck. The mistake is letting it do the analysis.
Rule of thumb: AI drafts the deck, you write the three bullets that matter. If you cannot write those bullets without the model, the problem is the analysis, not the tooling.
If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I’d keep the raw numbers in a sheet and have AI turn your own observations into slide structure, rather than asking it to interpret the data from scratch. A useful format is one headline, one chart, and one recommended action per slide; it keeps the deck focused and makes the interesting month-to-month changes easier to explain.
you could give julius ai a clean performance table and ask for slides on reach, engagement and conversions. separate paid and organic results so the comparison is easier to understand.
Maybe this is just me, but my social media workflow currently looks something like: ChatGPT → content ideas Canva → design Scheduler → publishing Analytics tool → reporting Inbox → replies Spreadsheet → planning And then I'm somehow supposed to call this an "efficient workflow"😂 I'm curious if anyone has actually found a social media management tool that brings more of this together. Especially now that Al tools are becoming more capable. Would you rather have one platform that can actually execute tasks, or do you prefer having separate best-in-class tools?
youtube announced this in august and it kicks in february 1 2027. new channels will need 8,000 watch hours in the last 365 days, up from 4,000, or 20 million shorts views in the last 90 days, up from 10 million. the 1,000 subscriber bar stays. if youre already in the partner program youre grandfathered in, you just have to accept the new terms in studio by january 31 to keep earning on the affected features thats the headline everyone ran. the line i almost missed is on youtubes own help page. to earn from the shorts creator pool each month, creators will need to maintain 10 million qualified shorts views over the last 90 days. the page doesnt spell out whether that part hits people already in the program the same way 10 million every 90 days is a lot for a shorts channel doing fine but not great. you could be monetized on paper and still get nothing from the shorts pool in a slow stretch youtube says the point is to fund new incentive programs for creator growth. my read is the long tail of small shorts channels just got priced out of the pool and whatever was spread across them ends up with the top channels anyone here in ypp mostly on shorts, are you clearing 10 million a quarter right now
I was thinking about this the other day. We used to treat the blue checkmark on Twitter or Insta as this little status thing, like oh you're somebody. LinkedIn's got its own verified badge now too. And the whole point of those was basically "this account is legit." But with how much AI and bot stuff is everywhere now, I feel like the flex is quietly shifting. It's not "I'm verified as important" anymore, it's becoming "I'm verified as an actual human being." Which is a hilarious bar to have to clear honestly. Congrats, you're a person, here's your badge. And the way you'd earn that badge is kind of low effort compared to the old verification circus, from what I've seen it's usually just a quick selfie, you show your face for a second and it confirms a real person's there. A few tools already do versions of this (Selfie Check, iProov, Incode, I think). I don't remember the exact details of each, something about proving you're a real unique human without your actual name or ID attached to it. So you could imagine a near future where that little "real human" tick is worth more than the old blue one ever was. Kind of a funny and weird timeline where proving you're not a robot is the new clout.
I've been thinking a lot about how social media has changed over the years. Originally, the idea was pretty simple: connect with people, share things, discover communities, and have conversations. But somewhere along the way, the focus shifted. Today, almost everything seems to revolve around reach, engagement, impressions, followers, and algorithms. People are incentivized to post whatever gets the most attention, while platforms are incentivized to keep us scrolling for as long as possible. And then there's the growing number of bots, AI-generated content, fake engagement, and accounts that aren't necessarily interested in genuine conversations. It sometimes feels like we're all participating in a giant competition for attention instead of actually connecting with each other. A small team I'm part of has been asking a question: **What would social media look like if we designed it around genuine human interaction instead of maximizing engagement?** We're actually working on a new decentralized social platform based on that idea. We're not claiming we can solve every problem. But we believe that if you start from scratch, you can make fundamentally different decisions about how a social platform should work. I'm curious what others think. **If you could change one fundamental thing about today's social media platforms, what would it be?**
​ I've noticed that YouTube is still my go-to for mobile reviews and detailed comparisons, but for everyday products, sauces, lifestyle recommendations, and discovering things worth buying, Instagram seems much better. I often find exactly what I'm looking for on Instagram, while YouTube shows outdated or irrelevant videos. It feels like YouTube is where we go for detailed reviews, but Instagram is where we discover what to buy. Has anyone else noticed this shift?
Hi! I'm a business owner and naturally started making content, i've noticed that my content does waaaaaaaay better on reels/instagram. I get a lot more engagement + viewership. I've had the same video get 30 likes on tiktok, then get over 100k likes on instagram. i've been trying to figure out why it's been difficult to get into tiktoks algo. I cross post on both, i don't really edit the video. Do you guys edit the videos for each platform? For tiktok, have you found more success niching down a video? does talking verbally to audience help? i have tried a couple of these but ultimately it still is kind of the same output. maybe my audience does not exist on tiktok? I know it might be different for everyone but i'm just wondering what has worked for posting on tiktok vs reels would appreciate any advice :)