When do you decide a social platform is sending the wrong kind of traffic?
I've been looking at social traffic reports more closely lately, and I keep running into the same problem: a platform can look successful while doing almost nothing for the business.
Lots of impressions and clicks, but very few people stick around, return, enquire or buy.
I used to compare platforms mostly by sessions and CTR. Now I'm more interested in whether the post and landing page make the same promise, and what people actually do after the click.
I'm also not sure it makes sense to judge every network the same way. Someone arriving from LinkedIn may be researching a business problem. An Instagram visitor may need a shorter, more visual path before they're ready to act.
The difficult part is deciding when there's enough evidence to stop investing in a channel. Low volume makes the data noisy, but "awareness is hard to measure" can also become an excuse to keep doing something that isn't working.
Have you ever stopped using a platform that was sending plenty of traffic because the visitors were the wrong fit? What convinced you?