What if a dating app allowed only ONE active match at a time?

I've been thinking about how most dating apps work today. You can match with multiple people, have several conversations, and keep swiping even after finding a potential connection.

There's also a common perception that some men struggle to get matches, while some women receive a large number of matches and messages. I wonder whether the way dating apps encourage continuous matching contributes to this experience.

So I was thinking about a different approach:

  1. Once you match with someone, you can't receive new matches. You focus on getting to know that person.
  2. Want to match with someone else? You have to unmatch your current connection first.

The goal would be to stop collecting matches and start building one connection at a time.

Would you use a dating app like this? What do you think would be the biggest problem with this model?

分享

评论

globaldesi•24 days ago•13

That’s what coffee meets bagel was way back when I met my husband in 2014. Only one option a day and then you moved on. That was their main selling point when they went on shark tank, along with the fact that they matched you with people who had mutuals with you.

I have no idea what the model is right now for Coffee Meets Bagel but suffice to say there is a reason it’s no longer what they’re doing.

ResilientSJ•24 days ago•5

Retention would tank the second someone gets bored or ghosted, since unmatching is the only exit and that friction just pushes people to delete the app entirely instead of sticking around.

BigBigBowser•24 days ago•3

You get matches?

allusernamesaretakan•22 days ago•2

just make it. stop asking for permission

i had this idea 3 years ago, i told people about it. they said it was stupid, so i never made it

just do it man. it is a good idea

Darling-dada•21 days ago•2

I think this is a smart idea to limit the illusion of choice. But I think 1 is too restrictive. Maybe 3 or 5 max at a time.

krantisdead•24 days ago•2

too slow

DesertStorm480•24 days ago•2

Nice in theory, but if people were not picky enough as it is......

InVegasMyLove•22 days ago•2

This is how I use Hinge. In the beginning, I tried matching with 10+ at once and ended up ignoring and missing possible chances with some because I couldn't keep up with conversations. Or I'd end up with a situation where I'd get a date scheduled for my only available time that week, and then I wouldn't know what to tell the others. It was just too much, so I match with one person and focus on them now. If they aren't responsive or don't seem interested, I quickly unmatch and move on to the next.

I'd definitely be interested in an app where this was the standard approach.

0oilllIIo0•21 days ago•1

I think this model would make women opt out of dating apps. I have sometimes thought of a less strict model of max 100 matches at a time, and you have to unmatch some to make room for new ones. And perhaps up to 5 active conversations allowed at one time.

This would create a reasonable experience, even for the popular ones.

NotCryptoKing•24 days ago•1

They do. Cuffed is like that.

Nice try using ChatGPT for this idea OP. A bit too late there

Trust me, whatever idea you or gpt has had, someone else has had it

相关推荐

r/socialmedia

Hot take: going viral once is one of the worst things that can happen to a small account

Hear me out. One post hits 500K views, you pick up a couple thousand followers who came for that one random thing, and then your next 10 posts do worse than before the viral one. Those new people followed a moment, not you. They don't watch your normal stuff, so the platform sees lower watch time and engagement on everything after and quietly pulls back reach. From what I've seen, more small accounts stall after a viral hit than grow from it. The ones that actually benefit already had a clear thing they post about, so the viral post was just a louder version of their normal content. So instead of chasing one big hit, maybe chase being the account people come back to. Disagree? Has a viral post actually helped your account long term, or did it mess up your reach after?

8 days ago
51· 100%62
r/socialmedia

Facebook is offering creators from tiktok and youtube real money to post there and the reaction has been rough

meta launched this in march, paying creators with existing followings on tiktok, instagram or youtube up to a few thousand dollars a month just to also post video on facebook. one reddit thread about it had a comment that stuck with me, someone said it plainly, looks like facebook is trying hard to pull creators away from tiktok and youtube, which is basically the whole strategy stated out loud the response from creators who actually tried it wasnt great. one person said they made ten cents off 275 thousand views. another with over 300 thousand followers said most posts were only getting 20 to 30 reactions total. the money is there upfront but the distribution once youre in doesnt match the size of the audience youre bringing over theres history here too that a few people brought up, facebook ran a gaming creator program back in 2018 that worked fine at first and then quietly got worse once payments dropped. people arent just being cautious for no reason, theyve seen this exact move from this exact platform before still, free money for cross posting something you already made is hard to say no to even with all that in mind, the actual math is going to be different depending on account size if facebook offered you this tomorrow, would the reach numbers above be enough to make you say no

27 days ago
38· 100%16
r/socialmedia

Hot take: posting every day is overrated for small accounts

I think posting every day is overrated for small accounts. Three posts a week that each have a real hook seem to beat seven rushed ones, and you don't burn out by week three. Daily posting mostly works for people who already have a system or a team. For everyone else it trains you to post filler. Change my mind: has daily posting actually worked for you, and on which platform?

10 days ago
37· 75%37
r/socialmedia

What's effective way to do organic marketing on Reddit.

/r/digital_marketing/comments/1m4qu1y/whats_effective_way_to_do_organic_marketing_on/

1 day ago
18
r/socialmedia

How Can I Track Exact Engagement for Facebook Group Posts & Regular Posts?

Hi everyone, I'm trying to understand how to track engagement accurately for Facebook Group posts compared with regular Facebook Normal posts. In Meta Business Suite's Content Library, I can see metrics such as views, viewers, engagement, follows, and impressions for my Page content. However, I'm unsure how to get the same engagement breakdown for posts published inside Facebook Groups. My questions are: 1. Where can I find the exact engagement numbers for regular Facebook Page posts? 2. How can I track engagement on posts published in Facebook Groups? 3. Does Meta Business Suite provide these metrics for both, or do Group posts need to be tracked separately? 4. Is there a way to see reactions, comments, shares, clicks, and reach for both post types? I'm looking for a reliable method to compare their performance without missing metrics or double-counting engagement. **What method or tool do you use to track this accurately?** Any practical guidance would be appreciated.

1 day ago
39
r/socialmedia

How do you check that video captions are easy to read before publishing?

Do you check text size, timing and contrast on a phone, or use another method? I would like a simple check that can be repeated before publishing, especially for viewers reading in a second language.

1 day ago
211