What is engagement on LinkedIn?

Everyone talks about "boosting engagement" but nobody actually breaks down what that means practically. Likes, comments, shares, clicks they all count differently and yet most people treat them the same.

From what I have seen comments carry the most weight both for the algorithm and for actual human memory. When someone leaves a genuinely thoughtful comment I remember their name way longer than whoever wrote the original post. Is that just me or does anyone else experience linkedIn that way?

Comments

Ok-Cost43025 days ago2

Comments are just free networking that most people ignore.

Glittering-Pen-40715 days ago1

I never thought about it this way until I noticed my own behavior. I'll forget a post in an hour but remember a commenter for weeks. Says everything really.

Unfair-Comment44495 days ago1

The way I see it  a like is a nod, a share is a handshake, but a comment is an actual conversation. LinkedIn's algorithm rewards dwell time and replies, and nothing creates that chain like a good comment thread. Most people optimizing for "engagement" are just chasing likes which is honestly the weakest signal of the three.

No_Procedure86675 days ago1

i think comments get all the credit but saves are the real sleeper. linkedin doesn't show them publicly so nobody talks about them, but i've had posts with barely any likes get pushed way harder than ones with tons of reactions, and the only difference i could see was saves.

the commenter thing you mentioned is real though. i'll forget who posted something but remember who left a good comment on it for weeks. some people figured this out and their whole strategy is just commenting on other people's stuff. never posting themselves. arguably better ROI tbh.

the other thing nobody talks about is that linkedin clearly treats long comments differently than "great post!" replies. like it's not even close. one thoughtful comment from someone with a decent network can do moren for a post's reach than 30 fire emojis

Independent_Use_36765 days ago1

I've noticed the same. Like are easy and happen almost automatically, but comments usually mean someone actually read and thought about the post.

From an algorithm perspective, comments and meaningful discussion tend to push post further because they signal real interaction.

Share are probably the strongest signal though, since someone is putting your content in front of their own network.

So practically it's something like: Likes = light interest, comments = real engagement, shares = strongest signal.

bengunners5 days ago1

One thing missing from most engagement discussions is timing. The first 60-90 minutes after posting is when LinkedIn decides if your content gets pushed wider or dies. Early comments (especially ones that generate replies) signal to the algorithm that there's a real conversation happening.

The reply chain effect is huge too. A single comment that sparks 4-5 back and forth replies can do more for your reach than 20 standalone comments. That's why the best commenters don't just drop a take and leave - they stick around and actually engage with responses.

I'd also add that the type of reaction matters more than people think. "Insightful" and "Love" reactions seem to carry slightly more weight than a basic like, probably because they require one extra click which signals more intent. Not a huge difference but noticeable over time.

The commenter memory thing you mentioned is 100% real. I've gotten more DMs and connection requests from strategic commenting than from posting. Some people have built entire personal brands just from being "that person" who always has something useful to add.

Various-Tailor-62095 days ago1

honestly you're 100% right about the memory thing. I've noticed the same, i can tell you exactly who wrote a thoughtful comment on my recent post but i couldn't tell you who just reacted to my them.

as far as the weighting goes, the LI algorithm is basically designed to back up exactly what you're seeing. It’s obsessed with dwell time and meaningful engagement rn. if someone stops to actually type a reply, it tells the algo the post is high quality, so it pushes it to a wider slice of your network.

a few things people usually miss when they talk about this:

  1. that first hour is everything. if you don't get a few comments in the first 60-90 min the algo will most likely bury it as it thinks its low quality.

  2. external links are reach killers (honestly the algo is so petty and jealous of you even suggesting someone to leave the platform) so its preferred to put your link in the comments, unless the post is all about the click, then I would still just put it in the post thb.

  3. posting and ghosting is a big no-no. make sure to be engaging on the platform before and after you post and def reply and react to any comments you get on your own post.

in short, if it feels like a real conversation, the algo loves it. if it feels like noise in a void, it dies.

AutoModerator5 days ago1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

justdivya4 days ago1

Understanding LinkedIn engagement is very tough tbh. I've started posting on LinkedIn for the past 2 months and it's been a very roller-coaster type of experience there. Sometimes some posts get thousands of views but barely 15–20 reactions, but on the other hand some posts get like 400–500 views and more reactions and comments than the posts with high views.

Usually, I pay more attention to comments and meaningful discussions. Because for me, if a post is getting fewer views but many people are commenting and starting conversations on it, that's stronger engagement than a post with high views but no interaction.

More like this

The Dark Side of Social Media: The Manosphere

I've just watched this docu 'Louis Theroux: Inside the Manosphere' on Netflix that dived into a truly dark corner of the internet a.k.a *the manosphere.* It is honestly shocking to see how social media has let men with deeply misogynistic, oppressive views build such massive platforms. Plus, a lot of these creators have audiences made up of minors. Do we need stricter age restrictions on social media to protect younger users? This is genuinely corruption. How might this affect the next generation of men? And more importantly, how do we push back against it?

7 days ago
136

how to grow on Insta ?

I have around 250 followers and I **have reels with an avg of 1k views more than that for most reels but now I have been posting daily and the reels get 500 to 1k only leave that my followers just don't increase? I wanna have a decent following before starting college later this year. and also how does everyone has 1k followers nowadays.**

6 days ago
819

Does TikTok distribute videos based on where you are located?

I recently started a TikTok account where I share my experience living abroad in my native language. I expected my videos to reach people in my home country who are curious about what life is like here. But most of the people watching and commenting seem to be people from my same country who already live here too. They comment things like “I felt the same when I moved here.” It feels like TikTok is mainly showing my videos to people in the country where I currently live rather than people back home. Does TikTok prioritize showing videos based on the creator’s location at first? Or will the algorithm eventually reach people in other countries who speak the language?

6 days ago
819