Kimchi’s reported jump from 500K to 25.6M impressions is an interesting distribution case

I’ve been researching how Kimchi’s name spread beyond his original trading audience and bitfan’s July 31 profile reports that one of his X posts reached 25.6 million impressions, compared with roughly 500,000 for earlier posts. That’s about 51 times the earlier figure. These are reported impressions, so they don’t tell us how many individual people saw it or became followers.

The content described in the article was largely lifestyle photography. My interpretation is that an existing audience already had a story to attach to those images, which gave people something to discuss when they shared them.

That makes the distribution worth examining. I’d want to compare the original post with the quote posts that introduced him to other audiences, then look at whether that attention carried into subsequent uploads.

The useful question for content work is how someone becomes recognisable outside the community that first knew them. Kimchi gives us a specific post and a substantial reported change in reach to start investigating.

Share

Comments

BennySkateboard•1 day ago•3

Like kimchi the food or is this an influencer?

AutoModerator•1 day ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

More like this

r/socialmedia

Youtube is doubling what it takes to get monetized, and theres a shorts rule in there most people skipped

youtube announced this in august and it kicks in february 1 2027. new channels will need 8,000 watch hours in the last 365 days, up from 4,000, or 20 million shorts views in the last 90 days, up from 10 million. the 1,000 subscriber bar stays. if youre already in the partner program youre grandfathered in, you just have to accept the new terms in studio by january 31 to keep earning on the affected features thats the headline everyone ran. the line i almost missed is on youtubes own help page. to earn from the shorts creator pool each month, creators will need to maintain 10 million qualified shorts views over the last 90 days. the page doesnt spell out whether that part hits people already in the program the same way 10 million every 90 days is a lot for a shorts channel doing fine but not great. you could be monetized on paper and still get nothing from the shorts pool in a slow stretch youtube says the point is to fund new incentive programs for creator growth. my read is the long tail of small shorts channels just got priced out of the pool and whatever was spread across them ends up with the top channels anyone here in ypp mostly on shorts, are you clearing 10 million a quarter right now

22 days ago
17· 100%11
r/socialmedia

Kind of funny how "verified human" might end up being the new blue tick

I was thinking about this the other day. We used to treat the blue checkmark on Twitter or Insta as this little status thing, like oh you're somebody. LinkedIn's got its own verified badge now too. And the whole point of those was basically "this account is legit." But with how much AI and bot stuff is everywhere now, I feel like the flex is quietly shifting. It's not "I'm verified as important" anymore, it's becoming "I'm verified as an actual human being." Which is a hilarious bar to have to clear honestly. Congrats, you're a person, here's your badge. And the way you'd earn that badge is kind of low effort compared to the old verification circus, from what I've seen it's usually just a quick selfie, you show your face for a second and it confirms a real person's there. A few tools already do versions of this (Selfie Check, iProov, Incode, I think). I don't remember the exact details of each, something about proving you're a real unique human without your actual name or ID attached to it. So you could imagine a near future where that little "real human" tick is worth more than the old blue one ever was. Kind of a funny and weird timeline where proving you're not a robot is the new clout.

about 1 month ago
17· 100%12
r/socialmedia

Anyone else wish you could just see posts from people you follow, without the algorithm deciding for you?

I got fed up with feeds full of suggested/random content instead of the people I actually follow. Curious if this resonates with anyone else here or if I'm overthinking a problem nobody else has.

about 1 month ago
17· 100%34
r/socialmedia

Followers don't automatically turn into sales, and I think the gap is usually on the website

Something I keep noticing with small brands: the Instagram or TikTok account feels alive. Real customers in the comments, try-on videos, people tagging the brand. Then you click through to the store and it's studio shots on a white background and nothing else. Everything that made you trust the brand stayed behind on the app. A few reasons I think followers convert worse than people expect: - The trust built on social doesn't travel with the click. People land on a product page that feels like a colder, different brand. - Most followers are there for the content, not to shop right now. A follow is closer to "I like this" than "I'll buy this." - The path from a post to the product is clumsy: link in bio, then the homepage, then searching for the thing they saw. - The proof people look for, real people actually wearing or using the product, lives on social and not where the buying decision happens. What seems to help is keeping some of that real content in front of people at the moment they're deciding, and making the jump from a post to the exact product as short as possible. Curious how others handle it. If you run social for a brand that sells online, do you bring your social content onto the website, or treat social purely as an awareness channel?

1 day ago
26
r/socialmedia

I think we're solving the wrong problem with AI content tools

Every new AI content tool seems to promise faster generation. Faster captions. Faster scripts. Faster images. More posts. But I'm starting to think content generation isn't even the biggest bottleneck for people managing social media. It's everything surrounding it. You research an idea in one place, draft somewhere else, send it for feedback, make revisions, schedule it, and then jump into another dashboard to see whether it performed. And when something works, the context behind *why* it worked often gets lost. I'm building a creator workflow product, so I'm particularly interested in this problem. But I don't want to assume everyone experiences it the same way. For people actually managing social accounts: Is producing the content still your biggest time sink, or has managing the entire process become worse? I'd especially like to hear from people managing multiple brands or clients.

1 day ago
02
r/socialmedia

AI Native Social Media Platforms

Do you guys know of any ai based social media app that is becoming popular(or is already popular). What are the chances of AI giving us the next instagram/tik tok/whatsapp?

1 day ago
08