The more I consume Instagram, the harder it gets to come up with good ideas.

My approach to content ideas is probably less organised than people imagine.

I don't have a magical Notion database filled with hundreds of original ideas, and I'm not constantly sitting around trying to think of the next viral reel.

Most of the time, I'm just consuming information and paying attention to things that interest me. I read books, watch interviews, study businesses, and occasionally go down ridiculously specific rabbit holes because something caught my attention.

When I come across an interesting idea, I try to understand why it works and whether it connects to something else I've seen.

A concept about human psychology might explain why a particular marketing campaign worked. A lesson from studying finance might change how I look at a creator's business model. Those connections usually make for much better content than repeating something I saw another creator say.

I think the mistake is treating ideation as an isolated activity. You sit down, open a blank page, and expect your brain to produce something interesting on command. But your brain can only work with the information and experiences you've given it.

Of course, studying other creators is useful, especially early on, when you're still figuring out how to structure a good story or hold someone's attention. I just wouldn't make them your only source of inspiration.

Personally, I've found that the best ideas show up when I'm not actively trying to create something. I'm learning about something, noticing a pattern, or connecting two things that seemed unrelated at first.

Then I realise there's a story worth telling.

The content is almost an afterthought.

Share

Comments

AutoModerator•about 14 hours ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Most_Conclusion_886•about 12 hours ago•1

Feels like my best ideas come at the worst possible times, like mid-shower or right when I'm about to fall asleep. The second I sit down with a blank page it's just static up there. You're spot on about making connections though, that's where the actually interesting stuff comes from instead of just rehashing what's already floating around

akrish_17•about 9 hours ago•1

Agree with this. The thing about only consuming other creators is you end up remixing the same 20 ideas everyone else is, so it all starts to look the same.

What I’ve noticed with my clients is the best ideas usually come from their customers, not their feeds. Questions they get asked at the counter, complaints, weird requests. That stuff is specific and nobody else has it.

I also keep a notes app list for anything that makes me go “huh” during the day. Most of it’s useless, but a couple a week turn into something. Nice post!

y3rk3•about 8 hours ago•1

the ideas usually come from keeping a running note of what made you curious that week, not from scrolling feeds. a notes file you add one line to daily beats a big idea list you never open. filter it by what you'd want to explain to a friend

VladMnu•about 6 hours ago•1

This is exactly why I stopped treating the feed as research for client accounts. After an hour of scrolling, every idea I had was just a worse version of a format I had just seen, because my brain was copying the shape instead of starting from the problem.

What works better for me is mining the boring real stuff. The objection that comes up on every sales call, the thing customers keep misunderstanding about the offer, the mistake we fixed last week. I keep a plain list of those in the customers own words and pull from that when I plan. The feed is still useful for spotting a format once I already know what I want to say, but if I start there, the idea never really becomes ours.

More like this

r/socialmedia

Youtube is doubling what it takes to get monetized, and theres a shorts rule in there most people skipped

youtube announced this in august and it kicks in february 1 2027. new channels will need 8,000 watch hours in the last 365 days, up from 4,000, or 20 million shorts views in the last 90 days, up from 10 million. the 1,000 subscriber bar stays. if youre already in the partner program youre grandfathered in, you just have to accept the new terms in studio by january 31 to keep earning on the affected features thats the headline everyone ran. the line i almost missed is on youtubes own help page. to earn from the shorts creator pool each month, creators will need to maintain 10 million qualified shorts views over the last 90 days. the page doesnt spell out whether that part hits people already in the program the same way 10 million every 90 days is a lot for a shorts channel doing fine but not great. you could be monetized on paper and still get nothing from the shorts pool in a slow stretch youtube says the point is to fund new incentive programs for creator growth. my read is the long tail of small shorts channels just got priced out of the pool and whatever was spread across them ends up with the top channels anyone here in ypp mostly on shorts, are you clearing 10 million a quarter right now

24 days ago
17· 100%11
r/socialmedia

Kind of funny how "verified human" might end up being the new blue tick

I was thinking about this the other day. We used to treat the blue checkmark on Twitter or Insta as this little status thing, like oh you're somebody. LinkedIn's got its own verified badge now too. And the whole point of those was basically "this account is legit." But with how much AI and bot stuff is everywhere now, I feel like the flex is quietly shifting. It's not "I'm verified as important" anymore, it's becoming "I'm verified as an actual human being." Which is a hilarious bar to have to clear honestly. Congrats, you're a person, here's your badge. And the way you'd earn that badge is kind of low effort compared to the old verification circus, from what I've seen it's usually just a quick selfie, you show your face for a second and it confirms a real person's there. A few tools already do versions of this (Selfie Check, iProov, Incode, I think). I don't remember the exact details of each, something about proving you're a real unique human without your actual name or ID attached to it. So you could imagine a near future where that little "real human" tick is worth more than the old blue one ever was. Kind of a funny and weird timeline where proving you're not a robot is the new clout.

about 1 month ago
17· 100%12
r/socialmedia

Anyone else wish you could just see posts from people you follow, without the algorithm deciding for you?

I got fed up with feeds full of suggested/random content instead of the people I actually follow. Curious if this resonates with anyone else here or if I'm overthinking a problem nobody else has.

about 1 month ago
17· 100%34
r/socialmedia

Can individuals make and sponsor political content?

So, I'm rich now, I've always complained about rich people influencing politics.. Can I do that? :D Can I just, make videos talking about politics and post them as "paid for by me" and sponsor them to get huge views? Seems sketch but with all these Russian bots maybe it is just that easy?

2 days ago
16
r/socialmedia

Creators with full time jobs

I’m finding it hard to create any sort of content that includes anything controversial because I’m worried I could get fired from my job, which I love. But it’s keeping me from growing because I don’t post the things I want to. But then I think most influencers have full time jobs as well? Idk what to do

2 days ago
511
r/socialmedia

Я нехнаю что делать

Всем привет я хочу у вас спросить я хочу начать снииать видио в тикток я хочу быть блогером но каждый раз меня останавливает то что я боюсь что меня засрут однокласники они и так ко мне относяься не очень им лишбы с меня посмеяться а если я заведу тикток то они его найдут и буду доставать меня и смеяться как думсете может не стоит оно того или на всех и все забить и делать то что я хочу?

2 days ago
14