My clients kept leaving at month three until I started showing the work they could not see

For a while my churn had a pattern I did not want to see.

Month one, the client was happy. Everything was new. Month two, they went a bit quiet. Month three, I would get a polite note saying it was not really working and they were going to pause.

The annoying part is that month three was usually when the reach was finally starting to move. They were leaving right before the part they had paid for.

I used to blame the results. Looking back, the results were only half of it. The other half was that the client could only see twelve posts a month. They did not see the planning, the sourcing, the captions rewritten twice, the comments handled, the DM answered on a Sunday. At renewal they were pricing what they could see, and what they could see looked thin.

I also never said the timeline out loud during the sale. They assumed weeks. Organic takes months. Nobody wants to say that while asking for money, so I did not, and the gap sat there until month three collected it.

Three changes fixed most of it.

First, a one page sheet at signing. What usually shows at 30 days, what shows at 60, what shows at 90, in plain words. Leading signs early, real movement later. I walk through it before they pay, not after they doubt.

Second, a short visible work note with the monthly summary. Not a big report. Just the work they never see, listed honestly: posts planned, comments handled, messages answered, things quietly fixed.

Third, I book the month three review at the start, not when I smell trouble. A real conversation at the exact point where they used to quietly decide on their own.

Renewals stopped being a surprise after that. One client quoted my own 30 60 90 sheet back to me on a call, which I will take over a polite cancel note any day.

How do you handle the month three dip? Do you set the timeline in writing, or do you handle it another way?

Share

Comments

memelackey•1 day ago•10

Thank you for the AI write-up. Your prompts must be excellent.

creatorctrl•1 day ago•2

Booking the review at signing is the detail that stuck with me. What do clients usually bring to that call?

AutoModerator•1 day ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

pagematter•about 17 hours ago•1

The renewal problem is really a timing problem. The client prices your work at the exact moment they're asked to pay again, against whatever they happen to remember. A month-end report helps, but it's still a summary of things they didn't watch happen. The version that sticks is visibility during the month - one shared place where they can see the planning, the drafts, the comments handled, as it happens. Then month three isn't a pitch, it's a receipt they've been looking at for weeks.

And saying the timeline out loud during the sale works as a filter, not just a warning. The clients who flinch at "organic takes months" in the first conversation are the same ones who leave at month three. Saying it early costs you some deals and saves you the churn you were going to have anyway.

More like this

r/socialmedia

Is it true that Threads lost 80% of their users?

I'm courious to give it a shot, cuz i like social media like threads. But on the internet I saw that lots of users just stopped to use that application. Are you still using it? My goal is to fully integrate with my ig profile, since I want to establish a dialogue with people to understand their needs and to brainstorm some ideas, since I'd like to build a brand starting from there. What kind of differences are compared to X? Thanks!

about 1 month ago
31· 100%37
r/socialmedia

Social media has completely lost its identity, and I’m so exhausted by it

Does anyone else feel like social media has changed so much since the pandemic? I feel like the pandemic didn't just change our lives offline. It changed how we live online, too. Short form videos and apps like TikTok became huge. Now it feels like every platform is trying to copy TikTok. Instagram and Facebook have Reels, YouTube has Shorts, Snapchat has Spotlight, and even other apps like Twitch are pushing short videos everywhere. It's like every company saw what worked during that time and decided that every app needed to work the same way. I miss when different platforms had their own purpose. You went to YouTube to watch longer videos, tutorials, documentaries, or someone's vlog, and storytelling. Instagram was more about photo sharing and keeping up with friends, family and a place for small businesses to grow. Other platforms had their own style, too. Now, no matter which app I open, I feel like I'm looking at the same endless feed of short clips. We lost the actual social part of social media. These apps aren't really social networks anymore. They feel more like algorithmic machines designed to keep you hooked. You barely see posts from people you actually know because your feed is filled with people chasing clout, platforms cramming ads everywhere and charging subscriptions just to remove them, and endless recommendations forced on you by an algorithm. I miss when feeds were chronological and you could actually catch up on what your friends posted, reach the bottom, close the app, and go on with your day. Now there is no end its a big loop. YouTube is probably the biggest example for me. I miss when it felt like a place to sit down and watch a proper video. Now there's so much focus on Shorts, views, and keeping people watching for as long as possible. Even already established creators like MrBeast post clips from their old content to recycle views instead of focusing on future content. They are just spamming 5 to 10 short clips a day to chase algorithmic reach and stay relevant. Small, aspiring creators are told to do the exact same thing for growing and becoming big; they are not told to post vlogs or stories explaining themselves and make meaningful content and organically grow. It’s just post clips, get views, and hope for exposure; even tutorials are now shrunk to 30 seconds from 30 minutes because that's what gets attention. It feels like generating quantity matters more than the quality of the content. A lot of us got used to having time to watch something everyday. Whenever we're bored, we open an app and start scrolling. There's always another video, another trend, another thing to react to. It can make it harder to enjoy slower things or sit with our own thoughts without reaching for our phones. I'm not saying short videos are always bad, or that everything was perfect before TikTok. But I don't want every platform to be built around the same kind of content. I don't want to open YouTube for a tutorial and end up with a 30 second sped up tutorial that doesn’t explain anything but forces me to endlessly start scrolling Shorts. I don't want every app to feel like it's fighting for my attention in exactly the same way. We need this to stop before it gets worse and ruins what made these platforms enjoyable. It is taking a serious toll on our mental health, too. The constant stream of short clips and endless scrolling is destroying our attention spans, making it almost impossible to focus on a single task, read a book, or watch a full video without feeling restless. On top of that, being fed non-stop highlight reels and viral trends fuels constant anxiety, self-doubt, and intense FOMO. Instead of relaxing, you just end up feeling drained, overstimulated, and like you're always missing out on something. I wish these platforms would remember what made people use them in the first place. Let YouTube be YouTube. Let Instagram be Instagram. Give people more control over their feeds, and let us turn off features we don't want instead of forcing them into every corner of an app. I genuinely miss when the internet felt more varied and less focused on keeping us hooked all day. The pandemic changed more than our offline routines. It changed how we spend our free time online, and I wonder if we'll ever get back some of that balance. If you agree with this, please share this post with your friends and family so maybe these corporations will actually look into changing how they design these apps.

17 days ago
30· 100%20
r/socialmedia

nobody needs to follow you anymore, and thats why your reels get views and no follows

everyone is asking why the views are fine and the follows are dead, and i think the answer is boring and structural, not the algorithm punishing anyone. think about why you used to follow an account. you followed so you would see their stuff again. that was the entire deal. now the feed serves you whatever it wants either way, and if that person makes another good video you will probably get shown it regardless. so following costs the viewer a slightly messier feed and gives them almost nothing back. the trade stopped making sense. which means "follow for more" is asking people to pay for something they already get for free. no wonder it quietly stopped working. the follows that still happen look different to me. people follow when they want to find you again on purpose. not to receive you, to locate you. thats a completely different job and it needs a different reason. a series where they want the next part. a name for the thing you do. something on the profile that signals there is more of this and its organised, not just one good video and then vibes. heres the part im not certain about and would like people to push back on. if this is right, two accounts making equally good videos should convert views into follows at wildly different rates depending on whether theres a recognisable recurring thing on the profile, and hook quality should barely matter for the follow specifically. it obviously still matters for the view. so if you run a series or a named format, does your follow rate look different from your one off posts? id like to know if this holds up or if im talking nonsense.

2 months ago
30· 99%10
r/socialmedia

how do you make "career content" fun on instagram?

helping with a small page that shows students careers beyond doctor/engineer. reels that just list facts die, but game-style stuff works, like career ladder videos. if this was your page, what's the first series you'd make?

about 14 hours ago
320
r/socialmedia

Ocupo seguidores

Ayudame a obtener seguidores. Recientemente deje mi trabajo para dedicarme a algo más tranquilo en esta transmisión me he dedicado a crear videos y he decidido dar entrada a esta cuenta en instagram para publicar cositas @laruthiee https://www.instagram.com/laruthiee?exln=djA4dXF5MXRwdHVv

about 17 hours ago
11
r/socialmedia

6 weeks after launch, 50 customers in. some stuff we learned about small accounts blowing up

I posted here a while back about Followlly, the thing we were building to figure out what to film next based on numbers instead of gut feeling. A bunch of you left good feedback so I figured I owe you an update. Short version of what it does now: it watches TikTok and Reels in your niche, catches videos that did way better than that creator usually does, tries to explain why (hook, length, sound, how it's structured) and turns that into a script for your account. It also compares your own videos against your own videos at the same age, so something posted 6 hours ago doesn't look like a flop next to stuff that's been up for weeks. People seem to like that part more than I expected. You just connect by handle, no passwords. We crossed 50 customers last week, which honestly I didn't expect this fast. Last time some of you called out real problems, and fair enough, you were right. One person said a tool like this just teaches everyone to copy each other. That one stung a bit, so now it pulls out the mechanic of a video (like a then-vs-now reveal or a mistake-and-fix format) and drops the topic and wording completely. Someone else noticed a video's own views were counted in the "usual" number it was being compared to, which made everything look better than it was. Fixed that. We also added "based on N videos" so you can see when a number is sitting on a tiny sample, and videos under a day old now get a "new" tag instead of showing crazy views-per-day. The thing I keep coming back to though is the data. We track a bunch of niches every week and small accounts blow up way more often than you'd think. This month we saw around 20 videos that got 100x to 2000x more views than the account had followers. One skincare account with 2.9k followers got 2.8M views on a video about toner. Toner. Also "keep it short" doesn't really hold up right now, at least in beauty. 3 out of 4 of the top videos there are over a minute, median is around 2 and a half minutes. And trending sounds matter less than everyone says. In fitness 96% of views this week went to videos with just original audio or a voiceover. The fastest growing one doesn't even have a caption lol. So my takeaway so far is the first couple seconds and whether people stick around matter way more than follower count or what song you picked. Next up is better coverage for niches outside beauty and fitness, and a weekly email with breakouts in your niche. There's also a free niche check on the site if you want to poke at it, no signup. Curious though, what's the biggest gap you've had between your follower count and views on one video?

about 20 hours ago
42