Meta's $17bn teen settlement: we read the 130-page agreement, and it doesn't quite match Meta's own announcement

In January 2024 Zuckerberg gave written testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Among the safety tools he listed: "Parental supervision tools, which let teens or their parents set daily limits for the total time that teens can spend on Instagram, Facebook, Messenger, Quest, and Horizon." Something families could choose to turn on.

On 26 August 2026 Meta settled the case brought by state attorneys general, eight days into the trial in Oakland. The judge approved it and entered it as a final judgment the same day. The agreement requires Meta to set every 13 to 17 year old to a default limit of two hours a day across its apps, plus a block from midnight to 6am. Only a parent can loosen it.

So the tool he described is now mandatory, and the person who can switch it off is the parent, not the teen. Meta built the tool. The settlement takes away the choice of whether to use it.

What it is not. It is not a confession, the judgment says in terms that Meta denies the allegations and any liability, and the judge approved it "without the final adjudication of issues of fact and law." Nobody found that Instagram harms teenagers. Companies settle mid-trial all the time.

What the documents say that the coverage doesn't. Three things we only found by reading the agreement itself:

We filed it as "routine", not a gotcha. Nothing was hidden; the default moved and the denial didn't. It's here because in two years, when someone asks whether the limits were Meta's idea, the testimony and the court order are both dated.

Source, with links to the Senate testimony, the signed judgment and the full agreement (hosted by the NJ and NY attorneys general): https://www.insidethesuits.com/receipts/13-zuckerberg-teen-time-limits/

分享

评论

AutoModerator•4 days ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Human_Character_8522•3 days ago•1

Reading these settlements feels like Groundhog Day, except the lawyers get richer and nothing really changes for teens using these apps.

相关推荐

r/socialmedia

Everything dying at 300 views for so long before I finally caught the problem

I've been absolutely obsessed with short form content for the last two years. Like people have staged actual interventions about my health level of obsessed. I'm talking 11-14 hour days breaking down what separates successful videos from failures, experimenting with different hook variations, rewriting scripts until my brain hurts, testing every editing approach I could possibly get my hands on. Why this level of obsession? Because I'm absolutely certain short form video is the backbone of everything right now. Growing followers, selling anything, generating opportunities, creating brands from nothing. Every part of it depends on whether you can hold someone's attention for 30 seconds. But here's what nearly made me quit entirely: despite the constant daily grind, nothing was hitting. I'd pour 7-8 hours into crafting one video only to watch it crash at 300 views. Tried every tactic from every person claiming to have figured it out. Bought their courses. Applied their "proven" methods. Still going nowhere. I seriously started thinking maybe I'm just not the type of person who can make this work. Like maybe there's some fundamental ability I'm completely lacking. Then something clicked. I'm grinding constantly, but I'm operating completely blind. I don't actually know what's broken. I'm essentially just trying random things hoping something eventually works. So I stopped hunting for some mythical viral code and started analyzing actual data. Analyzed my last 50 videos second by second, documented every retention drop, and discovered 5 consistent patterns that were systematically killing my performance: 1. **Vague mysterious hooks are totally invisible** "This will transform you..." gets scrolled past every time. But "I used resistance bands for 55 days and my shoulder mobility actually decreased" stops people mid scroll. Specific concrete details destroy vague teasing without exception. 2. **Seconds 5-7 are where everything gets decided** Most viewers leave between 4-7 seconds if you haven't proven it's worth watching. I was creating slow buildups like a complete amateur. Now my strongest visual or most compelling number arrives exactly at second 5. That's where the hook that genuinely holds people. 3. **Any gap beyond 1 second absolutely kills your retention** Tracked this obsessively, anything past 1.2 seconds makes people think the video stopped. What feels like natural comfortable pacing to you reads as complete dead time to someone scrolling. Cut significantly tighter than feels normal. 4. **Visual variety is absolutely critical** If nothing changes on screen for more than 3 seconds, attention vanishes without warning. I started constantly rotating camera angles, cutting to b-roll, moving text placement, literally anything to maintain constant visual movement. Went from losing 50% at the halfway mark to keeping 70%. 5. **Rewatch rate is dramatically more important than most people realize** Videos people watch more than once get pushed exponentially harder by the algorithm. Started planting subtle details that aren't obvious first viewing, editing faster, adding elements worth discovering on rewatch. Rewatch percentage jumped from 8% to 31% and reach went completely through the roof. Honestly the biggest shift was abandoning all guesswork and actually measuring what was happening at every second. Came across this one app that goes way beyond showing where people drop off, it literally tells you why and exactly how to correct it. That's when everything transformed. Went from averaging 300 views to hitting 18k in about 4 weeks. Regular analytics show you people are leaving. This one shows the exact second, the actual reason, and what to adjust before your next post. If you're uploading consistently but stuck below 1k views, your content isn't the problem. You just don't know what's genuinely working versus what you assume is working. Listen, I'm sharing this because breaking through was honestly one of the hardest things I've tackled. I really wish someone had just explained exactly what needed fixing when I was stuck there. Would have saved months of confusion and doubt. So that's what I'm doing now for anyone who needs it.

6 months ago
22· 81%1
r/socialmedia

Anyone else wish you could just see posts from people you follow, without the algorithm deciding for you?

I got fed up with feeds full of suggested/random content instead of the people I actually follow. Curious if this resonates with anyone else here or if I'm overthinking a problem nobody else has.

11 days ago
17· 100%34
r/socialmedia

Benifits of not using smartphone

I am(21M) we are 4 members in my family my younger sister and my parents . My mom runs a small shop and my father too. We all have smartphones except my mom. Over 5 years we are using phones. But my don't have a smartphone or any phone she doesn't even know how to use it. At the night when father comes home and she too then she watch some serial in phone. I noticed she is more happier than 3 of us. She is extremely focused on her work and doesn't complain for anything and handle all the situation very wisely. She knows the real world and not influenced by the fake social media world.

12 days ago
15· 100%4
r/socialmedia

I deleted my dad’s (soon to be, for the wrong reasons) viral LinkedIn post due to a safety oversight. Was I correct?

So my dad tasked me with coming up with posts for his personal LinkedIn account to grow his personal brand and like sort of get more work and all that. So the goal was to sort of paint him as an authority figure in his space right? Now the only problem is I basically know nothing about the industry… So I made the first post, I even sent him the text and image I would use alongside it before posting it to get a green light…making sure I’m not saying some bs. Now the text was perfect, but apparently the image I chose to go along with it had some major safety concerns which neither me, my dad or Claude thought about. I’m really gonna sound crazy but I don’t get how Claude allowed me to do this. Like I asked it is this a good picture to go along with the post. And it said it’s the best one I’ve suggested so far???? Like looking back at it the safety concern is so obvious so I don’t get how AI wouldn’t see it like bro 😭😭 Anyways. So I post and we get some early traction but nothing crazy, then this morning (2 days later after I posted it) it started gaining crazy traction like 1k impressions per hour. And it was sitting at 22K impressions and one person left the comment calling out the safety concern. And in 2 hours it got 10 likes. Then someone replied to that and agreed. Then about 20 minutes before I deleted it another person called out the safety concern so I could see where this is heading and I decided to delete it. I was debating what to do. Should I reply to acknowledge the safety oversight and say how it’s not safe and we don’t do it again and blah blah blah or just delete it. I ended up going with delete it as even if I replied more people would still leave those comments and it probably wouldn’t look the best for future people checking out the profile. My question is whether deleting it was the right move? Tbf there was plenty of comments left before someone called out the safety concern so I guess most people aren’t worried about that…idk… **A few things I’m hoping to get advice on from the community** **Was deleting it 100% the right move?** Or should I have tried to pivot the caption to an "educational safety warning" to save the 22k viral momentum? **Is 22k impressions a massive deal on LinkedIn?** Will people actually remember this a month from now, or does the feed move too fast? **How do I workflow this moving forward?** Since I don't know the industry and my dad missed it too, what boundaries should I set so we don't accidentally post a regulatory hazard again? I feel like if I sent my post + image to another AI to evaluate it from a legal/ safety perspective it would have flagged it, idk tho. Am I ok to post again in about 3 days? Like idk will people call me out again? Should I wait like a week or two before starting to post again? My plan was 2 weekly posts but now I’m scared lmao? Should we just hire some sort of LinkedIn marketing agency or something to do this for us cuz idk? We lowkey can’t afford it tho idk im just overthinking shit now bruh 😭😭 TL:DR my dad told me to grow his personal brand. I made a post with a major safety oversight and 2 days later the post started getting 1k impressions per hour and people started calling me (my dad) out. I deleted it cuz it felt like the safest thing, was I right?

2 days ago
017
r/socialmedia

Supervisor with public personal instagram account

Hi! Is it unprofessional for supervisor to have a public personal instagram account? There is basic normal pictures of me, my husband and dog, some humor things and what podcasts/music I listen to. So it's just a basic personal account, but often I see supervisors with private accounts... So what thoughts on that?

3 days ago
23
r/socialmedia

When do you decide a social platform is sending the wrong kind of traffic?

I've been looking at social traffic reports more closely lately, and I keep running into the same problem: a platform can look successful while doing almost nothing for the business. Lots of impressions and clicks, but very few people stick around, return, enquire or buy. I used to compare platforms mostly by sessions and CTR. Now I'm more interested in whether the post and landing page make the same promise, and what people actually do after the click. I'm also not sure it makes sense to judge every network the same way. Someone arriving from LinkedIn may be researching a business problem. An Instagram visitor may need a shorter, more visual path before they're ready to act. The difficult part is deciding when there's enough evidence to stop investing in a channel. Low volume makes the data noisy, but "awareness is hard to measure" can also become an excuse to keep doing something that isn't working. Have you ever stopped using a platform that was sending plenty of traffic because the visitors were the wrong fit? What convinced you?

3 days ago
29