What do saves and shares tell you about an informational post?
I read a save as something worth coming back to and a share as something worth passing on. Do you use either one to judge whether it helped?
I read a save as something worth coming back to and a share as something worth passing on. Do you use either one to judge whether it helped?
As a tiering system, likes are lowest then saves and then shares. Sharing with another human is most skin-in-the-game (sharing a bad post is embarrassing) when saving is clearly them saying to themself "I want to remember this or I want to come back to it"
Your read on this is 100% accurate. When analyzing audience behavior and mapping out content strategies, I actually use saves and shares as my primary KPIs for informational posts. Likes are basically just vanity metrics at this point.
Here is exactly how I read them to judge if a post actually helped:
So yes, I absolutely use both! High saves mean the post was highly educational. High shares mean it was highly relatable. If an informational post hits both, you've completely nailed it.
If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I'd look at saves per thousand reached and compare that with your own past informational posts. Raw counts mostly follow reach, so a post that got pushed further looks helpful whether it was or not. For whether it actually helped, the cleaner signal sits outside the post. If it answers something your team keeps getting asked in DMs or support tickets, count how often that question comes in over the next few weeks. Slower to read than saves. In-house it's also the number a support lead or a VP will care about when you ask for more time on that kind of content.
Hear me out. One post hits 500K views, you pick up a couple thousand followers who came for that one random thing, and then your next 10 posts do worse than before the viral one. Those new people followed a moment, not you. They don't watch your normal stuff, so the platform sees lower watch time and engagement on everything after and quietly pulls back reach. From what I've seen, more small accounts stall after a viral hit than grow from it. The ones that actually benefit already had a clear thing they post about, so the viral post was just a louder version of their normal content. So instead of chasing one big hit, maybe chase being the account people come back to. Disagree? Has a viral post actually helped your account long term, or did it mess up your reach after?
meta launched this in march, paying creators with existing followings on tiktok, instagram or youtube up to a few thousand dollars a month just to also post video on facebook. one reddit thread about it had a comment that stuck with me, someone said it plainly, looks like facebook is trying hard to pull creators away from tiktok and youtube, which is basically the whole strategy stated out loud the response from creators who actually tried it wasnt great. one person said they made ten cents off 275 thousand views. another with over 300 thousand followers said most posts were only getting 20 to 30 reactions total. the money is there upfront but the distribution once youre in doesnt match the size of the audience youre bringing over theres history here too that a few people brought up, facebook ran a gaming creator program back in 2018 that worked fine at first and then quietly got worse once payments dropped. people arent just being cautious for no reason, theyve seen this exact move from this exact platform before still, free money for cross posting something you already made is hard to say no to even with all that in mind, the actual math is going to be different depending on account size if facebook offered you this tomorrow, would the reach numbers above be enough to make you say no
I think posting every day is overrated for small accounts. Three posts a week that each have a real hook seem to beat seven rushed ones, and you don't burn out by week three. Daily posting mostly works for people who already have a system or a team. For everyone else it trains you to post filler. Change my mind: has daily posting actually worked for you, and on which platform?
you know on ig and tiktok there are a lot of contents creators who just yap about random stuff. mostly funny random thoughts about lives or talking about hot takes in the world. like those 20K followers, do they also monetize through their account? I am just curious and want to start doing it just for fun, first.
What are peoples thoughts of intentionally disabling comments on insta for a new clothing brand? I have weighed the pros and cons of doing this. There can be so much negativity spewed in the comments section by bots and people simply wanting to comment negatively. I am leaning closer to disabling purely to safeguard my own wellbeing, nothing more, and id be accepting the negatives of this.
Social media changes so fast that advice from even a year ago can feel outdated. I'm curious what strategies you've stopped using because they just don't deliver results anymore. And what's actually working for you in 2026?