Buenas, porque cuando pongo una historia en instagram de mejores amigos, las personas que selecciono solo pueden ver mi historia si entran directo a mi perfil, no les sale en la bandeja de stories, porque? , yo los sigo ellos a mi no, pero chat gpt dice que con que yo los siga a ellos basta para que les salga la historia en la bandeja
If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
microsoft owns linkedin (imo that is social media). google owns youtube. maybe it is time for Apple to start a social media given the rise of Muse creating personal dossiers on all of its users (Meta - Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp). or even acquire one? I would love to use something other than tiktok, snapchat, instagram, youtube, or linkedin. apple?
Maybe this is just me, but my social media workflow currently looks something like: ChatGPT ā content ideas Canva ā design Scheduler ā publishing Analytics tool ā reporting Inbox ā replies Spreadsheet ā planning And then I'm somehow supposed to call this an "efficient workflow"š I'm curious if anyone has actually found a social media management tool that brings more of this together. Especially now that Al tools are becoming more capable. Would you rather have one platform that can actually execute tasks, or do you prefer having separate best-in-class tools?
youtube announced this in august and it kicks in february 1 2027. new channels will need 8,000 watch hours in the last 365 days, up from 4,000, or 20 million shorts views in the last 90 days, up from 10 million. the 1,000 subscriber bar stays. if youre already in the partner program youre grandfathered in, you just have to accept the new terms in studio by january 31 to keep earning on the affected features thats the headline everyone ran. the line i almost missed is on youtubes own help page. to earn from the shorts creator pool each month, creators will need to maintain 10 million qualified shorts views over the last 90 days. the page doesnt spell out whether that part hits people already in the program the same way 10 million every 90 days is a lot for a shorts channel doing fine but not great. you could be monetized on paper and still get nothing from the shorts pool in a slow stretch youtube says the point is to fund new incentive programs for creator growth. my read is the long tail of small shorts channels just got priced out of the pool and whatever was spread across them ends up with the top channels anyone here in ypp mostly on shorts, are you clearing 10 million a quarter right now
Iām not a meta employee, but I am curious what the discourse is on ads? There are certain platforms that I completely agree with, TikTok specifically, 99% of artists who I talk to that paid for the promotion option on TikTok tell me the same thing which is that itās the worst thing ever and a complete waste of money, Iāve personally never ran an ad on TikTok because even if it werenāt a scam I donāt know how effective I could see that being on such a fast paced scroll and go app, I feel like youād have to drop a major bag for something like that to really make a difference However, I HAVE ran ads on Instagram, targeted ones AND āsuggested audienceā ones, Iāll say without a shadow of a doubt the āSuggested Audienceā option is a scam, you are going to get 100 followers but 90 of them follow 4000+ people and will never see a single one of your posts again, TARGETED ads however Iāve actually found quite a bit of success with in my niche, my idea of an ad āworkingā isnāt just the interaction jump and the followers itās WHO is following you and how likely they are to continue supporting your content/music The mass appeal theory is also very real, people are much more likely to pay attention to something with high engagement then they are to anything smaller. consistent content and quality content will always reign supreme over any form of ads, trial reels also seem to be a massive cheat code a lot of people still somehow havenāt cracked yet, but Iām just super confused why people seem to be so against the idea of an artist running some ads. lmk if Iām missing something though, I could definitely see it not being that great for certain niches
Iāve been researching how Kimchiās name spread beyond his original trading audience and bitfanās July 31 profile reports that one of his X posts reached 25.6 million impressions, compared with roughly 500,000 for earlier posts. Thatās about 51 times the earlier figure. These are reported impressions, so they donāt tell us how many individual people saw it or became followers. The content described in the article was largely lifestyle photography. My interpretation is that an existing audience already had a story to attach to those images, which gave people something to discuss when they shared them. That makes the distribution worth examining. Iād want to compare the original post with the quote posts that introduced him to other audiences, then look at whether that attention carried into subsequent uploads. The useful question for content work is how someone becomes recognisable outside the community that first knew them. Kimchi gives us a specific post and a substantial reported change in reach to start investigating.
Sharing this because I put the conversation off for almost a year and wish I had not. I have a client on a $900 a month retainer. Original scope was simple: 12 posts a month on two platforms, one monthly report, comments during business hours. By this summer it had quietly become 20ish posts, a third platform, stories most days, a weekly call that was never in the agreement, and comment replies on weekends because I felt awkward saying no. I finally tracked my actual hours for three months. Scoped: about 14 hours a month. Actual: 26, 29, then 31. My effective rate had dropped under $31 an hour, on the client I thought was my best one. What worked when I finally had the talk: I did not lead with a price increase. I sent a short scope report first. Two columns, what we agreed vs what last month actually looked like, with the hours next to each item. Then two options. Keep everything they are getting now at $1,450, or stay at $900 and drop back to the original scope, with the extras listed as add ons they can buy one at a time. Sixty days notice either way. They picked the bigger package in about ten minutes. Nobody was annoyed. The part I keep thinking about is that they had no idea how much had piled up, because I never told them. Half the drift was my fault for just absorbing it. Curious how others handle this. Do you track hours on retainers at all, or price it flat and not look? And when you have had this talk, did you lead with the data or just state the new price?