Are these influxes of TikTok followers bots?

I didn’t pay for engagement & I haven’t posted much, I’m trying to figure out how I gained almost 20 followers over the past 2-3 days. I know which videos of mine have higher engagement, and when you click on the analytics, it’ll tell you how many new followers were gained from that video. Some have liked content & followed, some just follow out of the blue it seems but I have more profile views. Most of these profiles may have a profile pic but no content, just likes and reposts.

Share

Comments

AutoModerator•2 days ago•1

If this post doesn't follow the rules, please report it to the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Traditional-Tap-5711•2 days ago•1

tiktok's algorithm just dumps random accounts on people, half those profiles are probably burner accounts that'll never post a thing

Troyster143•1 day ago•1

Your massive influx of 20 followers over 3 days is probably not bots lol

PeepSoWP•2 days ago•1

Twenty followers over two or three days is not suspicious by itself, especially if profile views also increased. Empty posting histories are weak evidence because many real TikTok users only watch, like, and repost.

Compare the timing of the follows with For You views, profile views, traffic source, audience location, and the videos that gained reach. A bot spike is more likely when follows arrive in a tight burst with no matching views or profile activity, the accounts share repetitive names or unrelated locations, and none of them produces later viewing or engagement.

I would leave them alone unless the pattern becomes clearly artificial. Do not use a third-party “follower cleanup” tool or give it account access. Watch whether those new followers return for the next few posts; that will tell you more than whether they have uploaded content themselves.

More like this

r/socialmedia

Best AI Image Generators in 2026: A Detailed Comparison Before You Buy

AI image generation has improved dramatically over the past few years. What used to be a choice between a handful of tools is now a crowded market with specialized platforms targeting different use cases. If you're considering a paid subscription, choosing the right tool can save both money and time. After researching and testing the major platforms, here's a breakdown of where each one excels. **1. Midjourney** *Best for*: Artists, creatives, and anyone prioritizing image quality. *Pros* * Industry-leading aesthetics * Exceptional lighting and composition * Great for concept art and cinematic visuals * Strong community and prompt resources *Cons* * Limited design-oriented workflows * Text generation still trails specialized tools * Less control compared to some competitors *Buy if:* Your main goal is creating visually stunning images that stand out. **2. Flux** *Best for*: Realistic image generation and prompt accuracy. *Pros* * Excellent prompt adherence * Strong photorealistic outputs * Growing ecosystem of integrations * Flexible deployment options *Cons* * Results can vary depending on the platform hosting it * Fewer beginner-friendly resources *Buy if:* You need realistic images and want the AI to follow prompts closely. **3. Ideogram** *Best for*: Marketing creatives and images containing text. *Pros* * Outstanding text rendering * Great for social media ads * Strong typography handling * Easy-to-use interface *Cons* * Artistic outputs aren't always as impressive as Midjourney * More focused on commercial design use cases *Buy if:* You frequently create ads, banners, thumbnails, or social content. **4. Recraft** *Best for:* Logos, branding, and vector graphics. *Pros* * Excellent vector generation * Strong branding workflows * Great for icons and illustrations * Useful for startup and agency work *Cons* * Not designed for photorealistic images * Smaller community compared to larger platforms *Buy if:* You need brand assets rather than artistic images. **5. Leonardo AI** *Best for:* Marketers, creators, and game asset production. *Pros* * Large collection of models * Useful templates and presets * Good balance between quality and usability * Strong editing tools *Cons* * Credit-based pricing may not suit heavy users * Can feel overwhelming initially *Buy if:* You want an all-in-one platform with lots of creative options. **6. Adobe Firefly** *Best for:* Businesses and Adobe users. *Pros* * Integrated with Adobe ecosystem * Commercial-friendly approach * Easy workflow for existing Adobe users * Strong editing features *Cons* * Creative outputs can feel less distinctive * Subscription costs add up if you're already paying for Adobe products *Buy if:* You already use Photoshop, Illustrator, or other Adobe tools. **Quick Recommendations** **Best Overall Image Quality** 🥇 Midjourney **Best Realistic Images** 🥇 Flux **Best for Marketing Creatives** 🥇 Ideogram **Best for Branding & Logos** 🥇 Recraft **Best All-Around Platform** 🥇 Leonardo AI **Best for Businesses** 🥇 Adobe Firefly If you're currently paying for an AI image generator, I'd love to hear your experience. * Which tool do you use most? * Which subscription gives the best value for money? * Have you switched platforms recently? * Which tool would you recommend to someone buying their first AI image generator? Looking forward to hearing real-world feedback from people who use these tools regularly.

5 months ago
14· 89%2
r/socialmedia

How do you guys find trending sounds, edits and content ideas?

Hey guys, just curious how you all keep up with trends on TikTok and Instagram? I'm talking trending sounds, cool transitions, editing styles, viral formats, UGC ideas etc. Do you use any specific websites, tools or accounts to find this stuff? Or is it literally just scrolling through TikTok and Reels until you find something? Trying to find a better way to spot trends early rather than when everyone's already doing them lol.

13 days ago
13· 100%12
r/socialmedia

I’ve worked in social/content for a few years now, and the biggest thing I’ve noticed recently is this

A lot of marketers are still making content for the version of social media that existed 4 years ago. Polished graphics. Perfect branding. Overplanned content calendars. Safe hooks. And then they wonder why nobody watches. Meanwhile the creators growing fastest are filming in their car, reacting to something they saw 10 minutes ago, and pulling 500k+ views with barely any editing. The gap between “professional looking” content and effective content has never been bigger. One thing that completely changed how I approach content was studying creators that are actively breaking through not the already famous ones with massive built in audiences. And once you start analyzing enough breakout posts, certain patterns become painfully obvious. Most viral content feels immediate. Not overproduced. Not corporate. Not “approved by 4 people in Slack.” Immediate. It feels like a real opinion, a real reaction, a real observation, a real emotion. That’s why reaction style content works so well right now. A contractor reacting to bad renovation videos. A fitness coach reacting to terrible workout advice. A marketer reacting to cringe ad campaigns. People don’t just want information anymore. They want perspective. Another thing I’ve noticed: most creators waste energy trying to be everywhere at once. TikTok. Reels. YouTube Shorts. LinkedIn. X. And they end up building nothing anywhere. The creators growing fastest usually dominate one format first. Because every platform rewards people who deeply understand pacing, hooks, audience behavior, and native style. You don’t learn that by spreading yourself thin. Also, almost nobody has a content creation problem anymore. They have a research problem. There’s already an insane amount of winning content patterns out there. The problem is most people study random viral posts, copy huge creators too late, chase trends after they peak, and miss why something actually worked. The fix is boring but it works: track creators suddenly blowing up, spot hooks repeating across platforms, notice formats migrating from TikTok to Reels to Shorts, and catch content styles gaining momentum before saturation. I’ve been using SHunt for exactly this. Not for inspiration just to see what’s gaining traction before it peaks. Once you see enough breakout content, you realize virality is way more pattern based than most people think.

5 months ago
13· 100%4
r/socialmedia

Kimchi’s reported jump from 500K to 25.6M impressions is an interesting distribution case

I’ve been researching how Kimchi’s name spread beyond his original trading audience and bitfan’s July 31 profile reports that one of his X posts reached 25.6 million impressions, compared with roughly 500,000 for earlier posts. That’s about 51 times the earlier figure. These are reported impressions, so they don’t tell us how many individual people saw it or became followers. The content described in the article was largely lifestyle photography. My interpretation is that an existing audience already had a story to attach to those images, which gave people something to discuss when they shared them. That makes the distribution worth examining. I’d want to compare the original post with the quote posts that introduced him to other audiences, then look at whether that attention carried into subsequent uploads. The useful question for content work is how someone becomes recognisable outside the community that first knew them. Kimchi gives us a specific post and a substantial reported change in reach to start investigating.

1 day ago
22· 100%6
r/socialmedia

I tracked my hours for 3 months. My $900 retainer was really a $500 one.

Sharing this because I put the conversation off for almost a year and wish I had not. I have a client on a $900 a month retainer. Original scope was simple: 12 posts a month on two platforms, one monthly report, comments during business hours. By this summer it had quietly become 20ish posts, a third platform, stories most days, a weekly call that was never in the agreement, and comment replies on weekends because I felt awkward saying no. I finally tracked my actual hours for three months. Scoped: about 14 hours a month. Actual: 26, 29, then 31. My effective rate had dropped under $31 an hour, on the client I thought was my best one. What worked when I finally had the talk: I did not lead with a price increase. I sent a short scope report first. Two columns, what we agreed vs what last month actually looked like, with the hours next to each item. Then two options. Keep everything they are getting now at $1,450, or stay at $900 and drop back to the original scope, with the extras listed as add ons they can buy one at a time. Sixty days notice either way. They picked the bigger package in about ten minutes. Nobody was annoyed. The part I keep thinking about is that they had no idea how much had piled up, because I never told them. Half the drift was my fault for just absorbing it. Curious how others handle this. Do you track hours on retainers at all, or price it flat and not look? And when you have had this talk, did you lead with the data or just state the new price?

1 day ago
95
r/socialmedia

I posted my first Reddit post today, it got 13k views in 9 hours. Is it luck, or did I find a strategy ?

I opened Reddit just today because I was frustrated with my content and didn’t know who to ask. I didn’t plan a hook or topic. I wrote everything that was on my mind the pain, the problem, the 161K followers that don’t pay, the audience mismatch, my fear that I’m selling something that doesn’t reliably get results everything. Within 3 hours, I got 10 comments who are really trying to give me genuine advice. I don't know whether it's a bot or something else, but the real ones gave me advice I couldn’t have gotten alone. It gave me a direction when I was stuck. I had this weird feeling always: whenever I feel like quitting my content business, one or another door opens. Today it's my first Reddit post I feel god keep pushing me not to quit But before posting, I saw a 2 pattern that made me to post it the way it got me views. Usually, my brain works in that way by capturing patterns and making content First, I noticed more "I" content, which is you telling your own story, or something that happened in life Second, Most of the titles I saw start with questions, so I added a question in my title Next time, when you are posting, try these things: share your real story; people are curious to read it and reply to you. Ask what you’re struggling with right now, and say it honestly. You may find the people who’ve had the same problem. A few things I’m still unsure about, since I’m new to Reddit: How much of this was the topic, and how much was the honest writing? Would the same approach work on a post with less pain in it? Is “pain first” a real pattern or a one-time result? I’m going to keep documenting my journey of building my content business to 1 million dollars a year, including the wins and the failures. If any pro Reddit players are here, give me your unpopular opinions on it and advice on how these things work See you on my next post krish

1 day ago
018